# T. Ohl - Würzburg University

## Contact Details

NameT. Ohl |
||

AffiliationWürzburg University |
||

CityWürzburg |
||

CountryGermany |
||

## Pubs By Year |
||

## External Links |
||

## Pub CategoriesHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (44) High Energy Physics - Experiment (12) High Energy Physics - Theory (11) Physics - Computational Physics (5) General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (3) Mathematics - Mathematical Physics (1) Computer Science - Mathematical Software (1) Mathematical Physics (1) |

## Publications Authored By T. Ohl

**Authors:**D. de Florian

^{1}, C. Grojean

^{2}, F. Maltoni

^{3}, C. Mariotti

^{4}, A. Nikitenko

^{5}, M. Pieri

^{6}, P. Savard

^{7}, M. Schumacher

^{8}, R. Tanaka

^{9}, R. Aggleton

^{10}, M. Ahmad

^{11}, B. Allanach

^{12}, C. Anastasiou

^{13}, W. Astill

^{14}, S. Badger

^{15}, M. Badziak

^{16}, J. Baglio

^{17}, E. Bagnaschi

^{18}, A. Ballestrero

^{19}, A. Banfi

^{20}, D. Barducci

^{21}, M. Beckingham

^{22}, C. Becot

^{23}, G. Bélanger

^{24}, J. Bellm

^{25}, N. Belyaev

^{26}, F. U. Bernlochner

^{27}, C. Beskidt

^{28}, A. Biekötter

^{29}, F. Bishara

^{30}, W. Bizon

^{31}, N. E. Bomark

^{32}, M. Bonvini

^{33}, S. Borowka

^{34}, V. Bortolotto

^{35}, S. Boselli

^{36}, F. J. Botella

^{37}, R. Boughezal

^{38}, G. C. Branco

^{39}, J. Brehmer

^{40}, L. Brenner

^{41}, S. Bressler

^{42}, I. Brivio

^{43}, A. Broggio

^{44}, H. Brun

^{45}, G. Buchalla

^{46}, C. D. Burgard

^{47}, A. Calandri

^{48}, L. Caminada

^{49}, R. Caminal Armadans

^{50}, F. Campanario

^{51}, J. Campbell

^{52}, F. Caola

^{53}, C. M. Carloni Calame

^{54}, S. Carrazza

^{55}, A. Carvalho

^{56}, M. Casolino

^{57}, O. Cata

^{58}, A. Celis

^{59}, F. Cerutti

^{60}, N. Chanon

^{61}, M. Chen

^{62}, X. Chen

^{63}, B. Chokoufé Nejad

^{64}, N. Christensen

^{65}, M. Ciuchini

^{66}, R. Contino

^{67}, T. Corbett

^{68}, D. Curtin

^{69}, M. Dall'Osso

^{70}, A. David

^{71}, S. Dawson

^{72}, J. de Blas

^{73}, W. de Boer

^{74}, P. de Castro Manzano

^{75}, C. Degrande

^{76}, R. L. Delgado

^{77}, F. Demartin

^{78}, A. Denner

^{79}, B. Di Micco

^{80}, R. Di Nardo

^{81}, S. Dittmaier

^{82}, A. Dobado

^{83}, T. Dorigo

^{84}, F. A. Dreyer

^{85}, M. Dührssen

^{86}, C. Duhr

^{87}, F. Dulat

^{88}, K. Ecker

^{89}, K. Ellis

^{90}, U. Ellwanger

^{91}, C. Englert

^{92}, D. Espriu

^{93}, A. Falkowski

^{94}, L. Fayard

^{95}, R. Feger

^{96}, G. Ferrera

^{97}, A. Ferroglia

^{98}, N. Fidanza

^{99}, T. Figy

^{100}, M. Flechl

^{101}, D. Fontes

^{102}, S. Forte

^{103}, P. Francavilla

^{104}, E. Franco

^{105}, R. Frederix

^{106}, A. Freitas

^{107}, F. F. Freitas

^{108}, F. Frensch

^{109}, S. Frixione

^{110}, B. Fuks

^{111}, E. Furlan

^{112}, S. Gadatsch

^{113}, J. Gao

^{114}, Y. Gao

^{115}, M. V. Garzelli

^{116}, T. Gehrmann

^{117}, R. Gerosa

^{118}, M. Ghezzi

^{119}, D. Ghosh

^{120}, S. Gieseke

^{121}, D. Gillberg

^{122}, G. F. Giudice

^{123}, E. W. N. Glover

^{124}, F. Goertz

^{125}, D. Gonçalves

^{126}, J. Gonzalez-Fraile

^{127}, M. Gorbahn

^{128}, S. Gori

^{129}, C. A. Gottardo

^{130}, M. Gouzevitch

^{131}, P. Govoni

^{132}, D. Gray

^{133}, M. Grazzini

^{134}, N. Greiner

^{135}, A. Greljo

^{136}, J. Grigo

^{137}, A. V. Gritsan

^{138}, R. Gröber

^{139}, S. Guindon

^{140}, H. E. Haber

^{141}, C. Han

^{142}, T. Han

^{143}, R. Harlander

^{144}, M. A. Harrendorf

^{145}, H. B. Hartanto

^{146}, C. Hays

^{147}, S. Heinemeyer

^{148}, G. Heinrich

^{149}, M. Herrero

^{150}, F. Herzog

^{151}, B. Hespel

^{152}, V. Hirschi

^{153}, S. Hoeche

^{154}, S. Honeywell

^{155}, S. J. Huber

^{156}, C. Hugonie

^{157}, J. Huston

^{158}, A. Ilnicka

^{159}, G. Isidori

^{160}, B. Jäger

^{161}, M. Jaquier

^{162}, S. P. Jones

^{163}, A. Juste

^{164}, S. Kallweit

^{165}, A. Kaluza

^{166}, A. Kardos

^{167}, A. Karlberg

^{168}, Z. Kassabov

^{169}, N. Kauer

^{170}, D. I. Kazakov

^{171}, M. Kerner

^{172}, W. Kilian

^{173}, F. Kling

^{174}, K. Köneke

^{175}, R. Kogler

^{176}, R. Konoplich

^{177}, S. Kortner

^{178}, S. Kraml

^{179}, C. Krause

^{180}, F. Krauss

^{181}, M. Krawczyk

^{182}, A. Kulesza

^{183}, S. Kuttimalai

^{184}, R. Lane

^{185}, A. Lazopoulos

^{186}, G. Lee

^{187}, P. Lenzi

^{188}, I. M. Lewis

^{189}, Y. Li

^{190}, S. Liebler

^{191}, J. Lindert

^{192}, X. Liu

^{193}, Z. Liu

^{194}, F. J. Llanes-Estrada

^{195}, H. E. Logan

^{196}, D. Lopez-Val

^{197}, I. Low

^{198}, G. Luisoni

^{199}, P. Maierhöfer

^{200}, E. Maina

^{201}, B. Mansoulié

^{202}, H. Mantler

^{203}, M. Mantoani

^{204}, A. C. Marini

^{205}, V. I. Martinez Outschoorn

^{206}, S. Marzani

^{207}, D. Marzocca

^{208}, A. Massironi

^{209}, K. Mawatari

^{210}, J. Mazzitelli

^{211}, A. McCarn

^{212}, B. Mellado

^{213}, K. Melnikov

^{214}, S. B. Menari

^{215}, L. Merlo

^{216}, C. Meyer

^{217}, P. Milenovic

^{218}, K. Mimasu

^{219}, S. Mishima

^{220}, B. Mistlberger

^{221}, S. -O. Moch

^{222}, A. Mohammadi

^{223}, P. F. Monni

^{224}, G. Montagna

^{225}, M. Moreno Llácer

^{226}, N. Moretti

^{227}, S. Moretti

^{228}, L. Motyka

^{229}, A. Mück

^{230}, M. Mühlleitner

^{231}, S. Munir

^{232}, P. Musella

^{233}, P. Nadolsky

^{234}, D. Napoletano

^{235}, M. Nebot

^{236}, C. Neu

^{237}, M. Neubert

^{238}, R. Nevzorov

^{239}, O. Nicrosini

^{240}, J. Nielsen

^{241}, K. Nikolopoulos

^{242}, J. M. No

^{243}, C. O'Brien

^{244}, T. Ohl

^{245}, C. Oleari

^{246}, T. Orimoto

^{247}, D. Pagani

^{248}, C. E. Pandini

^{249}, A. Papaefstathiou

^{250}, A. S. Papanastasiou

^{251}, G. Passarino

^{252}, B. D. Pecjak

^{253}, M. Pelliccioni

^{254}, G. Perez

^{255}, L. Perrozzi

^{256}, F. Petriello

^{257}, G. Petrucciani

^{258}, E. Pianori

^{259}, F. Piccinini

^{260}, M. Pierini

^{261}, A. Pilkington

^{262}, S. Plätzer

^{263}, T. Plehn

^{264}, R. Podskubka

^{265}, C. T. Potter

^{266}, S. Pozzorini

^{267}, K. Prokofiev

^{268}, A. Pukhov

^{269}, I. Puljak

^{270}, M. Queitsch-Maitland

^{271}, J. Quevillon

^{272}, D. Rathlev

^{273}, M. Rauch

^{274}, E. Re

^{275}, M. N. Rebelo

^{276}, D. Rebuzzi

^{277}, L. Reina

^{278}, C. Reuschle

^{279}, J. Reuter

^{280}, M. Riembau

^{281}, F. Riva

^{282}, A. Rizzi

^{283}, T. Robens

^{284}, R. Röntsch

^{285}, J. Rojo

^{286}, J. C. Romão

^{287}, N. Rompotis

^{288}, J. Roskes

^{289}, R. Roth

^{290}, G. P. Salam

^{291}, R. Salerno

^{292}, R. Santos

^{293}, V. Sanz

^{294}, J. J. Sanz-Cillero

^{295}, H. Sargsyan

^{296}, U. Sarica

^{297}, P. Schichtel

^{298}, J. Schlenk

^{299}, T. Schmidt

^{300}, C. Schmitt

^{301}, M. Schönherr

^{302}, U. Schubert

^{303}, M. Schulze

^{304}, S. Sekula

^{305}, M. Sekulla

^{306}, E. Shabalina

^{307}, H. S. Shao

^{308}, J. Shelton

^{309}, C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous

^{310}, S. Y. Shim

^{311}, F. Siegert

^{312}, A. Signer

^{313}, J. P. Silva

^{314}, L. Silvestrini

^{315}, M. Sjodahl

^{316}, P. Slavich

^{317}, M. Slawinska

^{318}, L. Soffi

^{319}, M. Spannowsky

^{320}, C. Speckner

^{321}, D. M. Sperka

^{322}, M. Spira

^{323}, O. Stål

^{324}, F. Staub

^{325}, T. Stebel

^{326}, T. Stefaniak

^{327}, M. Steinhauser

^{328}, I. W. Stewart

^{329}, M. J. Strassler

^{330}, J. Streicher

^{331}, D. M. Strom

^{332}, S. Su

^{333}, X. Sun

^{334}, F. J. Tackmann

^{335}, K. Tackmann

^{336}, A. M. Teixeira

^{337}, R. Teixeira de Lima

^{338}, V. Theeuwes

^{339}, R. Thorne

^{340}, D. Tommasini

^{341}, P. Torrielli

^{342}, M. Tosi

^{343}, F. Tramontano

^{344}, Z. Trócsányi

^{345}, M. Trott

^{346}, I. Tsinikos

^{347}, M. Ubiali

^{348}, P. Vanlaer

^{349}, W. Verkerke

^{350}, A. Vicini

^{351}, L. Viliani

^{352}, E. Vryonidou

^{353}, D. Wackeroth

^{354}, C. E. M. Wagner

^{355}, J. Wang

^{356}, S. Wayand

^{357}, G. Weiglein

^{358}, C. Weiss

^{359}, M. Wiesemann

^{360}, C. Williams

^{361}, J. Winter

^{362}, D. Winterbottom

^{363}, R. Wolf

^{364}, M. Xiao

^{365}, L. L. Yang

^{366}, R. Yohay

^{367}, S. P. Y. Yuen

^{368}, G. Zanderighi

^{369}, M. Zaro

^{370}, D. Zeppenfeld

^{371}, R. Ziegler

^{372}, T. Zirke

^{373}, J. Zupan

^{374}

**Affiliations:**

^{1}eds.,

^{2}eds.,

^{3}eds.,

^{4}eds.,

^{5}eds.,

^{6}eds.,

^{7}eds.,

^{8}eds.,

^{9}eds.,

^{10}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{11}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{12}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{13}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{14}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{15}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{16}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{17}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{18}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{19}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{20}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{21}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{22}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{23}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{24}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{25}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{26}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{27}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{28}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{29}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{30}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{31}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{32}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{33}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{34}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{35}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{36}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{37}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{38}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{39}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{40}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{41}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{42}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{43}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{44}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{45}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{46}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{47}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{48}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{49}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{50}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{51}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{52}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{53}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{54}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{55}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{56}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{57}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{58}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{59}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{60}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{61}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{62}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{63}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{64}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{65}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{66}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{67}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{68}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{69}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{70}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{71}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{72}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{73}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{74}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{75}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{76}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{77}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{78}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{79}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{80}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{81}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{82}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{83}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{84}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{85}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{86}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{87}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{88}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{89}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{90}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{91}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{92}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{93}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{94}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{95}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{96}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{97}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{98}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{99}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{100}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{101}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{102}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{103}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{104}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{105}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{106}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{107}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{108}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{109}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{110}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{111}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{112}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{113}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{114}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{115}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{116}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{117}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{118}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{119}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{120}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{121}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{122}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{123}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{124}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{125}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{126}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{127}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{128}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{129}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{130}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{131}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{132}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{133}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{134}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{135}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{136}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{137}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{138}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{139}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{140}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{141}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{142}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{143}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{144}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{145}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{146}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{147}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{148}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{149}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{150}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{151}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{152}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{153}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{154}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{155}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{156}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{157}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{158}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{159}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{160}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{161}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{162}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{163}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{164}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{165}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{166}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{167}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{168}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{169}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{170}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{171}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{172}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{173}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{174}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{175}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{176}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{177}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{178}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{179}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{180}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{181}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{182}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{183}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{184}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{185}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{186}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{187}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{188}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{189}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{190}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{191}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{192}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{193}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{194}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{195}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{196}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{197}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{198}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{199}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{200}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{201}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{202}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{203}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{204}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{205}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{206}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{207}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{208}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{209}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{210}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{211}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{212}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{213}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{214}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{215}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{216}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{217}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{218}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{219}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{220}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{221}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{222}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{223}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{224}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{225}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{226}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{227}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{228}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{229}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{230}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{231}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{232}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{233}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{234}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{235}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{236}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{237}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{238}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{239}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{240}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{241}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{242}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{243}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{244}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{245}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{246}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{247}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{248}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{249}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{250}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{251}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{252}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{253}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{254}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{255}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{256}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{257}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{258}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{259}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{260}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{261}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{262}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{263}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{264}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{265}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{266}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{267}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{268}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{269}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{270}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{271}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{272}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{273}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{274}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{275}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{276}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{277}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{278}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{279}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{280}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{281}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{282}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{283}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{284}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{285}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{286}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{287}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{288}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{289}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{290}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{291}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{292}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{293}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{294}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{295}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{296}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{297}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{298}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{299}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{300}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{301}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{302}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{303}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{304}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{305}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{306}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{307}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{308}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{309}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{310}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{311}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{312}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{313}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{314}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{315}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{316}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{317}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{318}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{319}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{320}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{321}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{322}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{323}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{324}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{325}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{326}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{327}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{328}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{329}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{330}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{331}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{332}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{333}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{334}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{335}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{336}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{337}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{338}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{339}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{340}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{341}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{342}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{343}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{344}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{345}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{346}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{347}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{348}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{349}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{350}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{351}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{352}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{353}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{354}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{355}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{356}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{357}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{358}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{359}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{360}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{361}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{362}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{363}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{364}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{365}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{366}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{367}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{368}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{369}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{370}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{371}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{372}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{373}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{374}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group

This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay branching ratios, parton distribution functions, and off-shell Higgs boson production and interference effects. Read More

Weak vector boson scattering at high energies will be one of the key measurements in current and upcoming LHC runs. It is most sensitive to any new physics associated with electroweak symmetry breaking. However, a conventional EFT analysis will fail at high energies. Read More

Vector boson scattering is (together with the production of multiple electroweak gauge bosons) the key process in the current run 2 of LHC to probe the microscopic nature of electroweak symmetry breaking. Deviations from the Standard Model are generically parameterized by higher-dimensional operators, however, there is a subtle issue of perturbative unitarity for such approaches for the process above. We discuss a parameter-free unitarization prescription to get physically meaningful predictions. Read More

State-of-the-art algorithms generate scattering amplitudes for high-energy physics at leading order for high-multiplicity processes as compiled code (in Fortran, C or C++). For complicated processes the size of these libraries can become tremendous (many GiB). We show that amplitudes can be translated to byte-code instructions, which even reduce the size by one order of magnitude. Read More

We study in a bottom-up approach the theoretically consistent description of additional resonances in the electroweak sector beyond the discovered Higgs boson as simplified models. We focus on scalar and tensor resonances. Our formalism is suited for strongly coupled models, but can also be applied to weakly interacting theories. Read More

We introduce a high-performance virtual machine (VM) written in a numerically fast language like Fortran or C to evaluate very large expressions. We discuss the general concept of how to perform computations in terms of a VM and present specifically a VM that is able to compute tree-level cross sections for any number of external legs, given the corresponding byte code from the optimal matrix element generator, O'Mega. Furthermore, this approach allows to formulate the parallel computation of a single phase space point in a simple and obvious way. Read More

We describe the multi-purpose Monte-Carlo event generator WHIZARD for the simulation of high-energy particle physics experiments. Besides the presentation of the general features of the program like SM physics, BSM physics, and QCD effects, special emphasis will be given to the support of the most accurate simulation of the collider environments at hadron colliders and especially at future linear lepton colliders. On the more technical side, the very recent code refactoring towards a completely object-oriented software package to improve maintainability, flexibility and code development will be discussed. Read More

Weak vector-boson W,Z scattering at high energy probes the Higgs sector and is most sensitive to any new physics associated with electroweak symmetry breaking. We show that in the presence of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, a conventional effective-theory analysis fails for this class of processes. We propose to extrapolate the effective-theory ansatz by an extension of the parameter-free K-matrix unitarization prescription, which we denote as direct T-matrix unitarization. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}DESY Hamburg,

^{2}Würzburg University

In an effective theory approach, the full minimal set of leading contributions to anomalous charged-current top couplings comprises various new trilinear tbW as well as quartic tbff' interaction vertices, some of which are related to one another by equations of motion. While much effort in earlier work has gone into the extraction of the trilinear couplings from single top measurements, we argue in this article that these structures can be assessed independently by other observables, while single top production forms a unique window to the four-fermion sector. An effective theory approach is employed to infer and classify the minimal set of such couplings from dimension six operators in the minimal flavor violation scheme. Read More

We review the current status of the WHIZARD event generator. We discuss, in particular, recent improvements and features that are relevant for simulating the physics program at a future Linear Collider. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

In an effective operator approach, the full set of leading contributions to anomalous top couplings comprises various new trilinear as well as higher interaction vertices, some of which are related to one another by gauge symmetry or equations of motion. In order to study trilinear top couplings to SM gauge bosons such as ttA, ttZ, tbW and ttg, the operator set can be restricted accordingly. However, the complete basis cannot be mapped onto an on-shell parametrisation of the trilinear vertices alone. Read More

For many practical purposes, it is convenient to formulate unbroken non-abelian gauge theories like QCD in a color-flow basis. We present a new derivation of SU(N) interactions in the color-flow basis by extending the gauge group to U(N)xU(1)' in such a way that the two U(1) factors cancel each other. We use the quantum action principles to show the equivalence to the usual basis to all orders in perturbation theory. Read More

We investigate the holographic description of CFTs defined on the cylinder and on AdS, which include an operator saturating the unitarity bound. The standard Klein-Gordon field with the corresponding mass and boundary conditions on global AdS_(d+1) and on an AdS_(d+1) geometry with AdS_d conformal boundary contains ghosts. We identify a limit in which the singleton field theory is obtained from the bulk theory with standard renormalized inner product, showing that a unitary bulk theory corresponding to an operator which saturates the unitarity bound can be formulated and that this yields a free field on the boundary. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

In extensions of the Standard Model with compactified extra dimensions, perturbative unitarity of the longitudinal gauge bosons is maintained through the contribution of heavy KK excitations of the gauge fields, without the necessity of introducing a Higgs field. The Three-Site Higgsless Model represents a minimal approach in this respect, containing just one extra set of heavy gauge bosons Z'/W' in the spectrum. While the Z' can have robust couplings to SM fermions and hence may be detected within the first 1-20 1/fb of LHC data at 14 TeV, the coupling of the W' to light fermions is suppressed and depends on the model parameters. Read More

We present a framework for performing a comprehensive analysis of a large class of supersymmetric models, including spectrum calculation, dark matter studies and collider phenomenology. To this end, the respective model is defined in an easy and straightforward way using the \Mathematica package SARAH. SARAH then generates model files for CalcHep which can be used with MicrOmegas as well as model files for WHIZARD and OMEGA. Read More

We consider N=4 SU(2)xU(1) gauged supergravity on asymptotically-AdS_5 backgrounds. By a near-boundary analysis we determine the boundary-dominant components of the bulk fields from their partially gauge-fixed field equations. Subdominant components are projected out in the boundary limit and we find a reduced set of boundary fields, constituting the N=2 Weyl multiplet. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Freiburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We study the pair production of charged gauge bosons at the LHC in a noncommutative extension of the standard model. We use angular distributions in the decays of the gauge bosons to partially reconstruct polarized cross sections. We use this, together with CP considerations, to construct more sensitive observables that allow to separate space-time from space-space noncommutativities. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

We construct consistent noncommutative (NC) deformations of the Randall-Sundrum spacetime that solve the NC Einstein equations with a non-trivial Poisson tensor depending on the fifth coordinate. In a class of these deformations where the Poisson tensor is exponentially localized on one of the branes (the NC-brane), we study the effects on bulk particles in terms of Lorentz-violating operators induced by NC-brane interactions. We sketch two models in which massive bulk particles mediate NC effects to an almost-commutative SM-brane, such that observables at high energy colliders are enhanced with respect to low energy and astrophysical observables. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

In this article we study the quantization of a free real scalar field on a class of noncommutative manifolds, obtained via formal deformation quantization using triangular Drinfel'd twists. We construct deformed quadratic action functionals and compute the corresponding equation of motion operators. The Green's operators and the fundamental solution of the deformed equation of motion are obtained in terms of formal power series. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We explore the LHC phenomenology of an extension of warped higgsless models. The model is supersymmetric in the bulk and on the IR brane as introduced in [arXiv:0805.1379], corresponding to an emergence of a supersymmetric spectrum in the composite sector of the higgsless model. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

We derive noncommutative Einstein equations for abelian twists and their solutions in consistently symmetry reduced sectors, corresponding to twisted FRW cosmology and Schwarzschild black holes. While some of these solutions must be rejected as models for physical spacetimes because they contradict observations, we find also solutions that can be made compatible with low energy phenomenology, while exhibiting strong noncommutativity at very short distances and early times. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

As a preparation for a mathematically consistent study of the physics of symmetric spacetimes in a noncommutative setting, we study symmetry reductions in deformed gravity. We focus on deformations that are given by a twist of a Lie algebra acting on the spacetime manifold. We derive conditions on those twists that allow a given symmetry reduction. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We study the production of the heavy W' and Z' bosons in the three site higgsless model at the LHC. We focus on the s-channel production mode to estimate the prospects for measuring their suppressed couplings to standard model fermions. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We introduce a minimal supersymmetric extension of a higgsless model for electroweak symmetry breaking in a warped extra dimension. In contrast to the non supersymmetric version, our model naturally contains a candidate for cold dark matter. No KK-parity is required, because its stability is guaranteed by an R-parity. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We study phenomenological consequences of a noncommutative extension of the standard model in the theta-expanded approach at the ILC. We estimate the sensitivity of the ILC for the noncommutative scale Lambda_NC. Comparing with earlier estimates for the LHC, we demonstrate the complementarity of the experiments at the two colliders. Read More

We describe the universal Monte-Carlo event generator WHIZARD. The program automatically computes complete tree-level matrix elements, integrates them over phase space, evaluates distributions of observables, and generates unweighted event samples that can be used directly in detector simulation. There is no principal limit on the process complexity; using current hardware, the program has successfully been applied to hard scattering processes with up to eight particles in the final state. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We derive the most general Seiberg-Witten maps for noncommutative gauge theories in second order of the noncommutative parameter theta. Our results reveal the existence of more ambiguities than previously known. In particular, we demonstrate that some of these ambiguities enter observables like scattering cross sections and enlarge the parameter space of the noncommutative standard model beyond O(theta). Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We study collider signals for the noncommutative extension of the standard model using the Seiberg-Witten maps for SU(3)_C x SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y to first order in the noncommutativity parameters theta_munu. In particular, we investigate the ensitivity of Z-gamma-production at the Tevatron and the LHC to the components of theta_munu. We discuss the range of validity of this approximation and estimate exclusion limits from a Monte Carlo simulation. Read More

**Authors:**B. C. Allanach

^{1}, C. Grojean

^{2}, P. Skands

^{3}, E. Accomando, G. Azuelos, H. Baer, C. Balazs, G. Belanger, K. Benakli, F. Boudjema, B. Brelier, V. Bunichev, G. Cacciapaglia, M. Carena, D. Choudhury, P. -A. Delsart, U. De Sanctis, K. Desch, B. A. Dobrescu, L. Dudko, M. El Kacimi, U. Ellwanger, S. Ferrag, A. Finch, F. Franke, H. Fraas, A. Freitas, P. Gambino, N. Ghodbane, R. M. Godbole, D. Goujdami, Ph. Gris, J. Guasch, M. Guchait, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, A. Hektor, S. Hesselbach, W. Hollik, C. Hugonie, T. Hurth, J. Idarraga, O. Jinnouchi, J. Kalinowski, J. -L. Kneur, S. Kraml, M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, R. Lafaye, G. Landsberg, T. Lari, J. S. Lee, J. Lykken, F. Mahmoudi, M. Mangano, A. Menon, D. J. Miller, T. Millet, C. Milstene, S. Montesano, F. Moortgat, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Moretti, D. E. Morrissey, S. Muanza, M. M. Muhlleitner, M. Muntel, H. Nowak, T. Ohl, S. Penaranda, M. Perelstein, E. Perez, S. Perries, M. Peskin, J. Petzoldt, A. Pilaftsis, T. Plehn, G. Polesello, A. Pompos, W. Porod, H. Przysiezniak, A. Pukhov, M. Raidal, D. Rainwater, A. R. Raklev, J. Rathsman, J. Reuter, P. Richardson, S. D. Rindani, K. Rolbiecki, H. Rzehak, M. Schumacher, S. Schumann, A. Semenov, L. Serin, G. Servant, C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous, S. Sherstnev, L. Silvestrini, R. K. Singh, P. Slavich, M. Spira, A. Sopczak, K. Sridhar, L. Tompkins, C. Troncon, S. Tsuno, K. Wagh, C. E. M. Wagner, G. Weiglein, P. Wienemann, D. Zerwas, V. Zhukov

**Affiliations:**

^{1}ed.,

^{2}ed.,

^{3}ed.

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

The work contained herein constitutes a report of the "Beyond the Standard Model'' working group for the Workshop "Physics at TeV Colliders", Les Houches, France, 2-20 May, 2005. We present reviews of current topics as well as original research carried out for the workshop. Supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric models are studied, as well as computational tools designed in order to facilitate their phenomenology. Read More

At the LHC and at an ILC, serious studies of new physics benefit from a proper simulation of signals and backgrounds. Using supersymmetric sbottom pair production as an example, we show how multi-particle final states are necessary to properly describe off-shell effects induced by QCD, photon radiation, or by intermediate on-shell states. To ensure the correctness of our findings we compare in detail the implementation of the supersymmetric Lagrangian in MadGraph, Sherpa and Whizard. Read More

We present a next generation of multi-particle Monte Carlo (MC) Event generators for LHC and ILC for the MSSM, namely the three program packages Madgraph/MadEvent, WHiZard/O'Mega and Sherpa/Amegic++. The interesting but difficult phenomenology of supersymmetric models at the upcoming colliders demands a corresponding complexity and maturity from simulation tools. This includes multi-particle final states, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, spin correlations, real emission of photons and gluons, etc. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We discuss the non-commutative extension of the standard model constructed with the Seiberg-Witten maps for SU(3)_C x SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y. Using the first-order approximation in the non-commutative parameters theta, we estimate the sensitivity of Z-gamma-production at the Tevatron and LHC from Monte Carlo simulation. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Wuerzburg University,

^{2}Karlsruhe University, TTP

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Extensions of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics to noncommutative geometries are proposed by string models. Independent of this motivation, one may consider such a model as an effective field theory with higher-dimensional operators containing an antisymmetric rank-2 background field. We study the signals of such a Noncommutative Standard Model (NCSM) and analyze the discovery potential of fermion pair production at a future photon collider. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Wuerzburg University,

^{2}Karlsruhe University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Extensions of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics to noncommutative geometries have been proposed as a low energy limit of string models. Independent of this motivation, one may consider such a model as an effective field theory with higher-dimensional operators containing an antisymmetric rank-two background field. We study the signals of such a Noncommutative Standard Model (NCSM) and analyze the discovery potential of a future photon collider, considering angular distributions in fermion pair production. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Mainz University

We discuss the use of BRST symmetry and the resulting Ward identities for orbifold gauge theories as consistency checks in an arbitrary number of dimensions. We verify that both the usual orbifold symmetry breaking and the recently proposed Higgsless symmetry breaking are consistent with the nilpotency of the BRST transformation. Imposing the Ward identities resulting from the BRST symmetry on the 4-point functions of theory, we obtain relations on the coupling constants that are shown to be equivalent to the conditions for tree level unitarity. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Würzburg University,

^{2}Würzburg University,

^{3}Würzburg University

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Theory

We study Ward identities for simple processes with external gauge bosons in the time-ordered perturbation theory approach to time-like noncommutative gauge theories. We demonstrate that these Ward identities cannot be satisfied when all orders in the noncommutativity parameters theta_i0 are taken into account. We conclude that in time-ordered perturbation theory one cannot solve the unitarity problem of time-like noncommutative quantum field theories. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Univ. Wuerzburg,

^{2}TU Darmstadt, Univ. Wuerzburg

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We determine the gauge invariance classes of tree level Feynman diagrams in spontaneously broken gauge theories, providing a proof for the formalism of gauge and flavor flips. We find new gauge invariance classes in theories with a nonlinearly realized scalar sector. In unitarity gauge, the same gauge invariance classes correspond to a decomposition of the scattering amplitude into pieces that satisfy the relevant Ward Identities individually. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Wuerzburg University,

^{2}Karlsruhe University

We study the cancellations among Feynman diagrams that implement the Ward and Slavnov-Taylor identities corresponding to the conserved supersymmetry current in supersymmetric quantum field theories. In particular, we show that the Faddeev-Popov ghosts of gauge- and supersymmetries never decouple from the physical fields, even for abelian gauge groups. The supersymmetric Slavnov-Taylor identities provide efficient consistency checks for automatized calculations and can verify the supersymmetry of Feynman rules and the numerical stability of phenomenological predictions simultaneously. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}University of Wuerzburg

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

I briefly summarize the parallel sessions on Automated Calculation and Simulation Systems for high energy particle physics phenomenology at ACAT 2002 (Moscow State University, June 2002) and present a short overview over the current status of the field and try to identify the important trends. Read More

**Authors:**R. -D. Heuer, D. J. Miller, F. Richard, P. M. Zerwas, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, J. Alcaraz, A. Ali, S. Ambrosanio, A. Andreazza, J. Andruszkow, B. Badelek, A. Ballestrero, T. Barklow, A. Bartl, M. Battaglia, T. Behnke, G. Belanger, D. Benson, M. Berggren, W. Bernreuther, M. Besancon, J. Biebel, O. Biebel, I. Bigi, J. J. van der Bij, T. Binoth, G. A. Blair, C. Blochinger, J. Blumlein, M. Boonekamp, E. Boos, G. Borissov, A. Brandenburg, J. -C. Brient, G. Bruni, K. Busser, P. Burrows, R. Casalbuoni, C. Castanier, P. Chankowski, A. Chekanov, R. Chierici, S. Y. Choi, P. Christova, P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, G. Conteras, M. Danilov, W. Da Silva, A. Deandrea, W. de Boer, S. De Curtis, S. J. De Jong, A. Denner, A. De Roeck, K. Desch, E. De Wolf, S. Dittmaier, V. Djordjadze, A. Djouadi, D. Dominici, M. Doncheski, M. T. Dova, V. Drollinger, H. Eberl, J. Erler, A. Eskreys, J. R. Espinosa, N. Evanson, E. Fernandez, J. Forshaw, H. Fraas, F. Franke, A. Freitas, F. Gangemi, P. Garcia-Abia, R. Gatto, P. Gay, T. Gehrmann, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, U. Gensch, N. Ghodbane, I. F. Ginzburg, R. Godbole, S. Godfrey, G. Gounaris, M. Grazzini, E. Gross, B. Grzadkowski, J. Guasch, J. F. Gunion, K. Hagiwara, T. Han, K. Harder, R. Harlander, R. Hawkings, S. Heinemeyer, S. Hesselbach, C. A. Heusch, J. Hewett, G. Hiller, A. Hoang, W. Hollik, J. I. Illana, V. A. Ilyin, D. Indumathi, S. Ishihara, M. Jack, S. Jadach, F. Jegerlehner, M. Jezabek, G. Jikia, L. Jonsson, P. Jankowski, P. Jurkiewicz, A. Juste, A. Kagan, J. Kalinowski, M. Kalmykov, P. Kalyniak, B. Kamal, J. Kamoshita, S. Kanemura, F. Kapusta, S. Katsanevas, R. Keranen, V. Khoze, A. Kiiskinen, W. Kilian, M. Klasen, J. L. Kneur, B. A. Kniehl, M. Kobel, K. Kolodziej, M. Kramer, S. Kraml, M. Krawczyk, J. H. Kuhn, J. Kwiecinski, P. Laurelli, A. Leike, J. Letts, W. Lohmann, S. Lola, P. Lutz, P. Mattig, W. Majerotto, T. Mannel, M. Martinez, H. -U. Martyn, T. Mayer, B. Mele, M. Melles, W. Menges, G. Merino, N. Meyer, D. J. Miller, P. Minkowski, R. Miquel, K. Monig, G. Montagna, G. Moortgat-Pick, P. Mora de Freitas, G. Moreau, M. Moretti, S. Moretti, L. Motyka, G. Moultaka, M. Muhlleitner, U. Nauenberg, R. Nisius, H. Nowak, T. Ohl, R. Orava, J. Orloff, P. Osland, G. Pancheri, A. A. Pankov, C. Papadopoulos, N. Paver, D. Peralta, H. T. Phillips, F. Picinini, W. Placzek, M. Pohl, W. Porod, A. Pukhov, A. Raspereza, D. Reid, S. Riemann, T. Riemann, S. Rosati, M. Roth, S. Roth, C. Royon, R. Ruckl, E. Ruiz-Morales, M. Sachwitz, J. Schieck, H. -J. Schreiber, D. Schulte, M. Schumacher, R. D. Settles, M. Seymour, R. Shanidze, T. Sjostrand, M. Skrzypek, S. Soldner-Rembold, A. Sopczak, H. Spiesberger, M. Spira, H. Steiner, M. Stratmann, Y. Sumino, S. Tapprogge, V. Telnov, T. Teubner, A. Tonazzo, C. Troncon, O. Veretin, C. Verzegnassi, A. Vest, A. Vicini, H. Videau, W. Vogelsang, A. Vogt, H. Vogt, D. Wackeroth, A. Wagner, S. Wallon, G. Weiglein, S. Weinzierl, T. Wengler, N. Wermes, A. Werthenbach, G. Wilson, M. Winter, A. F. Zarnecki, B. Ziaja, J. Zochowski

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

The TESLA Technical Design Report Part III: Physics at an e+e- Linear Collider Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Univ. di Ferrara & INFN Ferrara,

^{2}TU Darmstadt,

^{3}TU Darmstadt

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We sketch the architecture of O'Mega, a new optimizing compiler for tree amplitudes in quantum field theory, and briefly describe its usage. O'Mega generates the most efficient code currently available for scattering amplitudes for many polarized particles in the Standard Model and its extensions. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TU Darmstadt

I describe the optimizing matrix element generator O'Mega and Wolfgang Kilian's event generator generator WHIZARD. These tools cooperate in the automated production of efficient unweighted event generators for linear collider physics. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TU Darmstadt

I sketch the architecture of O'Mega, a new optimizing compiler for tree amplitudes in quantum field theory. O'Mega generates the most efficient code currently available for scattering amplitudes for many polarized particles in the standard model. A complete infrastructure for physics beyond the standard model is provided. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TU Darmstadt

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

The interactions of electroweak gauge bosons are severely constrained by the symmetries inferred from low energy observables. The exploration of the dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking requires therefore both an experimental sensitivity and a theoretical precision that is better than the natural scale of deviations from minimal extrapolations of the low energy effective theory. Some techniques for obtaining improved theoretical predictions for precision tests at a future e^+e^- linear collider are discussed. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Moscow State University,

^{2}TU Darmstadt

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We describe the explicit construction of groves, the smallest gauge invariant classes of tree Feynman diagrams in gauge theories Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Moscow State University,

^{2}TU Darmstadt

We describe the explicit construction of groves, the smallest gauge invariant classes of tree Feynman diagrams in gauge theories. The construction is valid for gauge theories with any number of group factors which may be mixed. It requires no summation over a complete gauge group multiplet of external matter fields. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Moscow State University,

^{2}Moscow State University,

^{3}TH Darmstadt

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We present the results of a complete tree level calculation of the processes pp(\bar p) -> Wb\bar b and Wb\bar b + jet that includes the single top signal and all irreducible backgrounds simultaneously. In order to probe the structure of the Wtb coupling with the highest possible accuracy and to look for possible deviations from standard model predictions, we identify sensitive observables and propose an optimal set of cuts which minimizes the background compared to the signal. At the LHC, the single top and the single anti-top rates are different and the corresponding asymmetry yields additional information. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TU Darmstadt

We present a new adaptive Monte Carlo integration algorithm for ill-behaved integrands with non-factorizable singularities. The algorithm combines Vegas with multi channel sampling and performs significantly better than Vegas for a large class of integrals appearing in physics. Read More

**Authors:**E. Boos

^{1}, V. Ilyin

^{2}, D. Kovalenko

^{3}, T. Ohl

^{4}, A. Pukhov

^{5}, M. Sachwitz

^{6}, H. J. Schreiber

^{7}

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{2}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{3}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{4}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{5}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{6}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen,

^{7}TU Darmstadt, Moscow State University, DESY-Zeuthen

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We present the results of calculations for the process gamma gamma -> W + 2 fermions at a future Photon Linear Collider (PLC). The calculations include at the same time the next-to-leading order Higgs signal and the complete tree level gauge boson background. We present numerical results in the intermediate mass Higgs region 140 GeV < M_H < 2M_W. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}TH Darmstadt,

^{2}TH Darmstadt

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We present a general classification of all four fermion final states in $\gamma\gamma$~collisions and a calculation of cross sections below the $W^+W^-$-threshold. Read More