G. Perez - The CDF Collaboration

G. Perez
Are you G. Perez?

Claim your profile, edit publications, add additional information:

Contact Details

Name
G. Perez
Affiliation
The CDF Collaboration
Location

Pubs By Year

Pub Categories

 
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (23)
 
Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science (15)
 
High Energy Physics - Experiment (11)
 
Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory (9)
 
Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence (5)
 
Physics - Atomic Physics (2)
 
High Energy Physics - Theory (2)
 
Mathematics - Functional Analysis (2)
 
Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors (1)
 
Quantitative Biology - Genomics (1)
 
Computer Science - Cryptography and Security (1)
 
High Energy Physics - Lattice (1)
 
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (1)
 
Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture (1)
 
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (1)
 
Quantum Physics (1)
 
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (1)
 
Astrophysics of Galaxies (1)

Publications Authored By G. Perez

Decidability of the determinization problem for weighted automata over the semiring $(\mathbb{Z} \cup {-\infty}, \max, +)$, WA for short, is a long-standing open question. We propose two ways of approaching it by constraining the search space of deterministic WA: k-delay and r-regret. A WA N is k-delay determinizable if there exists a deterministic automaton D that defines the same function as N and for all words {\alpha} in the language of N, the accepting run of D on {\alpha} is always at most k-away from a maximal accepting run of N on {\alpha}. Read More

Admissibility has been studied for games of infinite duration with Boolean objectives. We extend here this study to games of infinite duration with quantitative objectives. First, we show that, un- der the assumption that optimal worst-case and cooperative strategies exist, admissible strategies are guaranteed to exist. Read More

A standard objective in partially-observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) is to find a policy that maximizes the expected discounted-sum payoff. However, such policies may still permit unlikely but highly undesirable outcomes, which is problematic especially in safety-critical applications. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in POMDPs where the goal is to maximize the probability to ensure that the payoff is at least a given threshold, but these approaches do not consider any optimization beyond satisfying this threshold constraint. Read More

2016Oct
Authors: D. de Florian1, C. Grojean2, F. Maltoni3, C. Mariotti4, A. Nikitenko5, M. Pieri6, P. Savard7, M. Schumacher8, R. Tanaka9, R. Aggleton10, M. Ahmad11, B. Allanach12, C. Anastasiou13, W. Astill14, S. Badger15, M. Badziak16, J. Baglio17, E. Bagnaschi18, A. Ballestrero19, A. Banfi20, D. Barducci21, M. Beckingham22, C. Becot23, G. Bélanger24, J. Bellm25, N. Belyaev26, F. U. Bernlochner27, C. Beskidt28, A. Biekötter29, F. Bishara30, W. Bizon31, N. E. Bomark32, M. Bonvini33, S. Borowka34, V. Bortolotto35, S. Boselli36, F. J. Botella37, R. Boughezal38, G. C. Branco39, J. Brehmer40, L. Brenner41, S. Bressler42, I. Brivio43, A. Broggio44, H. Brun45, G. Buchalla46, C. D. Burgard47, A. Calandri48, L. Caminada49, R. Caminal Armadans50, F. Campanario51, J. Campbell52, F. Caola53, C. M. Carloni Calame54, S. Carrazza55, A. Carvalho56, M. Casolino57, O. Cata58, A. Celis59, F. Cerutti60, N. Chanon61, M. Chen62, X. Chen63, B. Chokoufé Nejad64, N. Christensen65, M. Ciuchini66, R. Contino67, T. Corbett68, D. Curtin69, M. Dall'Osso70, A. David71, S. Dawson72, J. de Blas73, W. de Boer74, P. de Castro Manzano75, C. Degrande76, R. L. Delgado77, F. Demartin78, A. Denner79, B. Di Micco80, R. Di Nardo81, S. Dittmaier82, A. Dobado83, T. Dorigo84, F. A. Dreyer85, M. Dührssen86, C. Duhr87, F. Dulat88, K. Ecker89, K. Ellis90, U. Ellwanger91, C. Englert92, D. Espriu93, A. Falkowski94, L. Fayard95, R. Feger96, G. Ferrera97, A. Ferroglia98, N. Fidanza99, T. Figy100, M. Flechl101, D. Fontes102, S. Forte103, P. Francavilla104, E. Franco105, R. Frederix106, A. Freitas107, F. F. Freitas108, F. Frensch109, S. Frixione110, B. Fuks111, E. Furlan112, S. Gadatsch113, J. Gao114, Y. Gao115, M. V. Garzelli116, T. Gehrmann117, R. Gerosa118, M. Ghezzi119, D. Ghosh120, S. Gieseke121, D. Gillberg122, G. F. Giudice123, E. W. N. Glover124, F. Goertz125, D. Gonçalves126, J. Gonzalez-Fraile127, M. Gorbahn128, S. Gori129, C. A. Gottardo130, M. Gouzevitch131, P. Govoni132, D. Gray133, M. Grazzini134, N. Greiner135, A. Greljo136, J. Grigo137, A. V. Gritsan138, R. Gröber139, S. Guindon140, H. E. Haber141, C. Han142, T. Han143, R. Harlander144, M. A. Harrendorf145, H. B. Hartanto146, C. Hays147, S. Heinemeyer148, G. Heinrich149, M. Herrero150, F. Herzog151, B. Hespel152, V. Hirschi153, S. Hoeche154, S. Honeywell155, S. J. Huber156, C. Hugonie157, J. Huston158, A. Ilnicka159, G. Isidori160, B. Jäger161, M. Jaquier162, S. P. Jones163, A. Juste164, S. Kallweit165, A. Kaluza166, A. Kardos167, A. Karlberg168, Z. Kassabov169, N. Kauer170, D. I. Kazakov171, M. Kerner172, W. Kilian173, F. Kling174, K. Köneke175, R. Kogler176, R. Konoplich177, S. Kortner178, S. Kraml179, C. Krause180, F. Krauss181, M. Krawczyk182, A. Kulesza183, S. Kuttimalai184, R. Lane185, A. Lazopoulos186, G. Lee187, P. Lenzi188, I. M. Lewis189, Y. Li190, S. Liebler191, J. Lindert192, X. Liu193, Z. Liu194, F. J. Llanes-Estrada195, H. E. Logan196, D. Lopez-Val197, I. Low198, G. Luisoni199, P. Maierhöfer200, E. Maina201, B. Mansoulié202, H. Mantler203, M. Mantoani204, A. C. Marini205, V. I. Martinez Outschoorn206, S. Marzani207, D. Marzocca208, A. Massironi209, K. Mawatari210, J. Mazzitelli211, A. McCarn212, B. Mellado213, K. Melnikov214, S. B. Menari215, L. Merlo216, C. Meyer217, P. Milenovic218, K. Mimasu219, S. Mishima220, B. Mistlberger221, S. -O. Moch222, A. Mohammadi223, P. F. Monni224, G. Montagna225, M. Moreno Llácer226, N. Moretti227, S. Moretti228, L. Motyka229, A. Mück230, M. Mühlleitner231, S. Munir232, P. Musella233, P. Nadolsky234, D. Napoletano235, M. Nebot236, C. Neu237, M. Neubert238, R. Nevzorov239, O. Nicrosini240, J. Nielsen241, K. Nikolopoulos242, J. M. No243, C. O'Brien244, T. Ohl245, C. Oleari246, T. Orimoto247, D. Pagani248, C. E. Pandini249, A. Papaefstathiou250, A. S. Papanastasiou251, G. Passarino252, B. D. Pecjak253, M. Pelliccioni254, G. Perez255, L. Perrozzi256, F. Petriello257, G. Petrucciani258, E. Pianori259, F. Piccinini260, M. Pierini261, A. Pilkington262, S. Plätzer263, T. Plehn264, R. Podskubka265, C. T. Potter266, S. Pozzorini267, K. Prokofiev268, A. Pukhov269, I. Puljak270, M. Queitsch-Maitland271, J. Quevillon272, D. Rathlev273, M. Rauch274, E. Re275, M. N. Rebelo276, D. Rebuzzi277, L. Reina278, C. Reuschle279, J. Reuter280, M. Riembau281, F. Riva282, A. Rizzi283, T. Robens284, R. Röntsch285, J. Rojo286, J. C. Romão287, N. Rompotis288, J. Roskes289, R. Roth290, G. P. Salam291, R. Salerno292, R. Santos293, V. Sanz294, J. J. Sanz-Cillero295, H. Sargsyan296, U. Sarica297, P. Schichtel298, J. Schlenk299, T. Schmidt300, C. Schmitt301, M. Schönherr302, U. Schubert303, M. Schulze304, S. Sekula305, M. Sekulla306, E. Shabalina307, H. S. Shao308, J. Shelton309, C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous310, S. Y. Shim311, F. Siegert312, A. Signer313, J. P. Silva314, L. Silvestrini315, M. Sjodahl316, P. Slavich317, M. Slawinska318, L. Soffi319, M. Spannowsky320, C. Speckner321, D. M. Sperka322, M. Spira323, O. Stål324, F. Staub325, T. Stebel326, T. Stefaniak327, M. Steinhauser328, I. W. Stewart329, M. J. Strassler330, J. Streicher331, D. M. Strom332, S. Su333, X. Sun334, F. J. Tackmann335, K. Tackmann336, A. M. Teixeira337, R. Teixeira de Lima338, V. Theeuwes339, R. Thorne340, D. Tommasini341, P. Torrielli342, M. Tosi343, F. Tramontano344, Z. Trócsányi345, M. Trott346, I. Tsinikos347, M. Ubiali348, P. Vanlaer349, W. Verkerke350, A. Vicini351, L. Viliani352, E. Vryonidou353, D. Wackeroth354, C. E. M. Wagner355, J. Wang356, S. Wayand357, G. Weiglein358, C. Weiss359, M. Wiesemann360, C. Williams361, J. Winter362, D. Winterbottom363, R. Wolf364, M. Xiao365, L. L. Yang366, R. Yohay367, S. P. Y. Yuen368, G. Zanderighi369, M. Zaro370, D. Zeppenfeld371, R. Ziegler372, T. Zirke373, J. Zupan374
Affiliations: 1eds., 2eds., 3eds., 4eds., 5eds., 6eds., 7eds., 8eds., 9eds., 10The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 11The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 12The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 13The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 14The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 15The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 16The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 17The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 18The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 19The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 20The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 21The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 22The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 23The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 24The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 25The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 26The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 27The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 28The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 29The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 30The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 31The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 32The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 33The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 34The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 35The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 36The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 37The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 38The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 39The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 40The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 41The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 42The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 43The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 44The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 45The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 46The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 47The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 48The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 49The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 50The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 51The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 52The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 53The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 54The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 55The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 56The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 57The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 58The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 59The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 60The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 61The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 62The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 63The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 64The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 65The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 66The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 67The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 68The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 69The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 70The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 71The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 72The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 73The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 74The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 75The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 76The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 77The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 78The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 79The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 80The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 81The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 82The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 83The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 84The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 85The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 86The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 87The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 88The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 89The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 90The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 91The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 92The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 93The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 94The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 95The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 96The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 97The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 98The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 99The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 100The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 101The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 102The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 103The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 104The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 105The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 106The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 107The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 108The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 109The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 110The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 111The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 112The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 113The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 114The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 115The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 116The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 117The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 118The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 119The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 120The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 121The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 122The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 123The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 124The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 125The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 126The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 127The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 128The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 129The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 130The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 131The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 132The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 133The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 134The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 135The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 136The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 137The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 138The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 139The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 140The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 141The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 142The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 143The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 144The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 145The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 146The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 147The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 148The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 149The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 150The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 151The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 152The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 153The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 154The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 155The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 156The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 157The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 158The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 159The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 160The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 161The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 162The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 163The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 164The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 165The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 166The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 167The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 168The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 169The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 170The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 171The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 172The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 173The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 174The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 175The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 176The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 177The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 178The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 179The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 180The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 181The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 182The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 183The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 184The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 185The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 186The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 187The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 188The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 189The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 190The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 191The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 192The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 193The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 194The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 195The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 196The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 197The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 198The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 199The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 200The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 201The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 202The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 203The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 204The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 205The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 206The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 207The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 208The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 209The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 210The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 211The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 212The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 213The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 214The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 215The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 216The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 217The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 218The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 219The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 220The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 221The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 222The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 223The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 224The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 225The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 226The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 227The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 228The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 229The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 230The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 231The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 232The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 233The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 234The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 235The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 236The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 237The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 238The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 239The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 240The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 241The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 242The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 243The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 244The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 245The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 246The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 247The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 248The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 249The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 250The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 251The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 252The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 253The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 254The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 255The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 256The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 257The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 258The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 259The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 260The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 261The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 262The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 263The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 264The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 265The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 266The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 267The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 268The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 269The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 270The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 271The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 272The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 273The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 274The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 275The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 276The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 277The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 278The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 279The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 280The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 281The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 282The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 283The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 284The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 285The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 286The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 287The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 288The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 289The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 290The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 291The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 292The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 293The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 294The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 295The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 296The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 297The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 298The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 299The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 300The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 301The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 302The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 303The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 304The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 305The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 306The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 307The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 308The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 309The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 310The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 311The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 312The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 313The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 314The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 315The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 316The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 317The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 318The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 319The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 320The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 321The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 322The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 323The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 324The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 325The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 326The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 327The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 328The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 329The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 330The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 331The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 332The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 333The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 334The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 335The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 336The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 337The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 338The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 339The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 340The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 341The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 342The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 343The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 344The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 345The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 346The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 347The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 348The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 349The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 350The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 351The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 352The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 353The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 354The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 355The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 356The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 357The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 358The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 359The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 360The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 361The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 362The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 363The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 364The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 365The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 366The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 367The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 368The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 369The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 370The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 371The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 372The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 373The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 374The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group

This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay branching ratios, parton distribution functions, and off-shell Higgs boson production and interference effects. Read More

We show that the relaxion generically stops its rolling at a point that breaks CP leading to relaxion-Higgs mixing. This opens the door to a variety of observational probes since the possible relaxion mass spans a broad range from sub-eV to the GeV scale. We derive constraints from current experiments (fifth force, astrophysical and cosmological probes, beam dump, flavour, LEP and LHC) and present projections from future experiments such as NA62, SHiP and PIXIE. Read More

In this note we consider the problem of introducing variables in temporal logic programs under the formalism of "Temporal Equilibrium Logic" (TEL), an extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP) for dealing with linear-time modal operators. To this aim, we provide a definition of a first-order version of TEL that shares the syntax of first-order Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) but has a different semantics, selecting some LTL models we call "temporal stable models". Then, we consider a subclass of theories (called "splittable temporal logic programs") that are close to usual logic programs but allowing a restricted use of temporal operators. Read More

The European School of High-Energy Physics is intended to give young physicists an introduction to the theoretical aspects of recent advances in elementary particle physics. These proceedings contain lecture notes on the Standard Model of electroweak interactions, quantum chromodynamics, Higgs physics, physics beyond the Standard Model, flavour physics, and practical statistics for particle physicists. Read More

In this paper we present an extension of Peirce's existential graphs to provide a diagrammatic representation of expressions in Quantified Equilibrium Logic (QEL). Using this formalisation, logical connectives are replaced by encircled regions (circles and squares) and quantified variables are represented as "identity" lines. Although the expressive power is equivalent to that of QEL, the new representation can be useful for illustrative or educational purposes. Read More

2016Sep
Affiliations: 1Saarland University, 2Graz University of Technology, 3University of Oxford, 4Graz University of Technology, 5Saarland University, 6Graz University of Technology, 7Saarland University, 8Data 61, CSIRO, 9Samsung Research America, 10Université Libre de Bruxelles, 11Université Libre de Bruxelles, 12Samsung Research America, 13CNRS, Irisa, 14Johannes-Kepler-University Linz, 15Saarland University, 16Independent Researcher

We report on the benchmarks, participants and results of the third reactive synthesis competition(SYNTCOMP 2016). The benchmark library of SYNTCOMP 2016 has been extended to benchmarks in the new LTL-based temporal logic synthesis format (TLSF), and 2 new sets of benchmarks for the existing AIGER-based format for safety specifications. The participants of SYNTCOMP 2016 can be separated according to these two classes of specifications, and we give an overview of the 6 tools that entered the competition in the AIGER-based track, and the 3 participants that entered the TLSF-based track. Read More

Diphoton searches at high invariant mass are an integral part of the experimental high energy frontier. Using the analyses of the 750\,GeV diphoton resonance as a case study, we examine the methodology currently employed by the experimental analyses in estimating the dominant standard model backgrounds. We assess the dependence of the significance associated with the excess on the background modeling. Read More

In order to cope with the ever increasing traffic load that networks will need to support, a new approach for planning cellular networks deployments should be followed. Traditionally, cell association and resource allocation has been based on the received signal power but this approach seems to be inadequate regarding the brewing of heterogeneous networks. In this work, we first implement a network simulator in order to test new cell associacion and resource allocation techniques. Read More

The Latin American Giant Observatory (LAGO) is an extended cosmic ray observatory composed by a network of water-Cherenkov detectors spanning over different sites located at significantly different altitudes (from sea level up to more than $5000$\,m a.s.l. Read More

The CERN - Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics is intended to give young physicists an introduction to the theoretical aspects of recent advances in elementary particle physics. These proceedings contain lecture notes on the Standard Model of electroweak interactions, quantum chromodynamics, flavour physics, quantum chromodynamics under extreme conditions, cosmic-ray physics, cosmology, recent highlights of LHC results, practical statistics for particle physicists and a short introduction to the principles of particle physics instrumentation. Read More

In this paper, we describe Compact-Table (CT), a bitwise algorithm to enforce Generalized Arc Consistency (GAC) on table con- straints. Although this algorithm is the default propagator for table constraints in or-tools and OscaR, two publicly available CP solvers, it has never been described so far. Importantly, CT has been recently improved further with the introduction of residues, resetting operations and a data-structure called reversible sparse bit-set, used to maintain tables of supports (following the idea of tabular reduction): tuples are invalidated incrementally on value removals by means of bit-set operations. Read More

Precise isotope shift spectroscopy in various atomic systems can provide a sensitive tool to constrain new physics, in particular new physics that couples to electrons and neutrons [1]. We present an analysis for estimating the reach of such measurements in the framework of effective field theory and various benchmark models for SM extensions: color neutral vector resonances, leptoquarks and the $750\,\textrm{GeV}$ scalar diphoton resonance. We also provide a comparison with the reach of the LHC, $e^+e^-$ colliders and $g-2$ of the electron. Read More

2016Feb
Affiliations: 1Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2Graz University of Technology, Austria, 3Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 4Graz University of Technology, Austria, 5Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 6Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 7NICTA, Sydney, Australia and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, 8Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 9Johannes-Kepler-University, Linz, Austria, 10Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany, 11NICTA, Sydney, Australia

We report on the design and results of the second reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2015). We describe our extended benchmark library, with 6 completely new sets of benchmarks, and additional challenging instances for 4 of the benchmark sets that were already used in SYNTCOMP 2014. To enhance the analysis of experimental results, we introduce an extension of our benchmark format with meta-information, including a difficulty rating and a reference size for solutions. Read More

2016Feb
Affiliations: 1Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2Université Libre de Bruxelles, 3Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4Université Libre de Bruxelles

We study the synthesis of circuits for succinct safety specifications given in the AIG format. We show how AIG safety specifications can be decomposed automatically into sub specifications. Then we propose symbolic compositional algorithms to solve the synthesis problem compositionally starting for the sub-specifications. Read More

We propose an approach to probe new fundamental interactions using isotope shift spectroscopy in atomic clock transitions. As an example we focus on the Higgs boson couplings to the building blocks of matter: the electron and the up and down quarks. We show that the attractive Higgs force between nuclei and their bound electrons, that is poorly constrained, might induce effects that are larger than the current experimental sensitivities. Read More

Context. The most primitive metal-poor stars are important for studying the conditions of the early galaxy and are also relevant to big bang nucleosynthesis. Aims. Read More

In this invited contribution, we summarize new solution concepts useful for the synthesis of reactive systems that we have introduced in several recent publications. These solution concepts are developed in the context of non-zero sum games played on graphs. They are part of the contributions obtained in the inVEST project funded by the European Research Council. Read More

We discuss the implications of the significant excesses in the diphoton final state observed by the LHC experiments ATLAS and CMS around a diphoton invariant mass of 750 GeV. The interpretation of the excess as a spin-zero s-channel resonance implies model-independent lower bounds on both its branching ratio and its coupling to photons, which stringently constrain dynamical models. We consider both the case where the excess is described by a narrow and a broad resonance. Read More

In this paper we study two-player games with asymmetric partial observation and an energy objective. Such games are played on a weighted automaton by Eve, choosing actions, and Adam, choosing a transition labelled with the given action. Eve attempts to maintain the sum of the weights (of the transitions taken) non-negative while Adam tries to do the opposite. Read More

We analyse the low-energy phenomenology of alignment models both model-independently and within supersymmetric (SUSY) scenarios focusing on their CP violation tests at LHCII. Assuming that New Physics (NP) contributes to K-Kbar and D-Dbar mixings only through non-renormalizable operators involving SU(2)_L quark-doublets, we derive model-independent correlations among CP violating observables of the two systems. Due to universality of CP violation in Delta F=1 processes the bound on CP violation in Kaon mixing generically leads to an upper bound on the size of CP violation in D mixing. Read More

We study constraints from LHC run I on squark and gluino masses in the presence of squark flavor violation. Inspired by the concept of `flavored naturalness', we focus on the impact of a non-zero stop-scharm mixing and mass splitting in the right-handed sector. To this end, we recast four searches of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations, dedicated either to third generation squarks, to gluino and squarks of the first two generations, or to charm-squarks. Read More

We study almost square Banach spaces under a topological point of view. Indeed, we prove that the class of Banach spaces which admits an equivalent norm to be ASQ is that of those Banach spaces which contain an isomorphic copy of $c_0$. We also prove that the symmetric projective tensor products of an almost square Banach space have the strong diameter two property Read More

In this paper, we study the problem of minimizing regret in discounted-sum games played on weighted game graphs. We give algorithms for the general problem of computing the minimal regret of the controller (Eve) as well as several variants depending on which strategies the environment (Adam) is permitted to use. We also consider the problem of synthesizing regret-free strategies for Eve in each of these scenarios. Read More

The aim of this note is to provide several variants of the diameter two properties for Banach spaces. We study such properties looking for the abundance of diametral points, which holds in the setting of Banach spaces with the Daugavet property, for example, and we intro- duce the diametral diameter two properties in Banach spaces, showing for these new properties stability results, inheritance to subspaces and characterizations in terms of finite rank projections. Read More

We consider the recently proposed cosmological relaxation mechanism where the hierarchy problem is ameliorated, and the electroweak scale is dynamically selected by a slowly rolling axion field. We argue that, in its simplest form, the construction breaks a gauge symmetry that always exists for pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons (in particular the axion). The small parameter in the relaxion model is therefore not technically natural as it breaks a gauge symmetry rather than global symmetries only. Read More

It is now established that the major source of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB) is due to the observed Higgs particle. However, whether the Higgs mechanism is responsible for the generation of all the fermion masses, in particular, the fermions of the first two generations, is an open question. In this letter we present a construction where the light fermion masses are generated through a secondary, subdominant and sequestered source of EWSB. Read More

In this paper we provide an alternative semantics for Equilibrium Logic and its monotonic basis, the logic of Here-and-There (also known as G\"odel's G3 logic) that relies on the idea of "denotation" of a formula, that is, a function that collects the set of models of that formula. Using the three-valued logic G3 as a starting point and an ordering relation (for which equilibrium/stable models are minimal elements) we provide several elementary operations for sets of interpretations. By analysing structural properties of the denotation of formulas, we show some expressiveness results for G3 such as, for instance, that conjunction is not expressible in terms of the other connectives. Read More

We introduce the reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP), a long-term effort intended to stimulate and guide advances in the design and application of synthesis procedures for reactive systems. The first iteration of SYNTCOMP is based on the controller synthesis problem for finite-state systems and safety specifications. We provide an overview of this problem and existing approaches to solve it, and report on the design and results of the first SYNTCOMP. Read More

Hadrons have finite interaction size with dense material, a basic feature common to known forms of hadronic calorimeters (HCAL). We argue that substructure variables cannot use HCAL information to access the microscopic nature of jets much narrower than the hadronic shower size, which we call superboosted massive jets. It implies that roughly 15% of their transverse energy profile remains inaccessible due to the presence of long-lived neutral hadrons. Read More

We discuss the prospects to probe the light-quark Yukawa couplings to the Higgs boson. The Higgs coupling to the charm quark can be probed both via inclusive and exclusive approaches. On the inclusive frontier, we use our recently proposed method together with published experimental studies for the sensitivity of the Higgs coupling to bottom quarks to find that the high-luminosity LHC can be sensitive to modifications of the charm Yukawa of the order of a few times its standard model (SM) value. Read More

We study the relations between Multi-valued Decision Diagrams (MDD) and tuples (i.e. elements of the Cartesian Product of variables). Read More

We study a generalisation of sabotage games, a model of dynamic network games introduced by van Benthem. The original definition of the game is inherently finite and therefore does not allow one to model infinite processes. We propose an extension of the sabotage games in which the first player (Runner) traverses an arena with dynamic weights determined by the second player (Saboteur). Read More

Genetic variation in the tomato clade was explored by sequencing a selection of 84 tomato accessions and related wild species representative for the Lycopersicon, Arcanum, Eriopersicon, and Neolycopersicon groups. We present a reconstruction of three new reference genomes in support of our comparative genome analyses. Sequence diversity in commercial breeding lines appears extremely low, indicating the dramatic genetic erosion of crop tomatoes. Read More

Mean-payoff games (MPGs) are infinite duration two-player zero-sum games played on weighted graphs. Under the hypothesis of perfect information, they admit memoryless optimal strategies for both players and can be solved in NP-intersect-coNP. MPGs are suitable quantitative models for open reactive systems. Read More

Two-player zero-sum games of infinite duration and their quantitative versions are used in verification to model the interaction between a controller (Eve) and its environment (Adam). The question usually addressed is that of the existence (and computability) of a strategy for Eve that can maximize her payoff against any strategy of Adam. In this work, we are interested in strategies of Eve that minimize her regret, i. Read More

We introduce four different types of data-driven analyses with different level of robustness that constrain the size of the Higgs-charm Yukawa coupling: (i) recasting the vector-boson associated, Vh, analyses that search for bottom-pair final state. We use this mode to directly and model independently constrain the Higgs to charm coupling, y_c/y_c^{SM} < 234; (ii) the direct measurement of the total width, y_c/y_c^{SM} < 120-140; (iii) the search to h -> J/\psi\gamma, y_c/y_c^{SM} < 220; (iv) a global fit to the Higgs signal strengths, y_c/y_c^{SM} < 6.2. Read More

We study the phenomenology of vector resonances in the context of natural composite Higgs models. A mild hierarchy between the fermionic partners and the vector resonances can be expected in these models based on the following arguments. Both direct and indirect (electroweak and flavor precision) constraints on fermionic partners are milder than the ones on spin one resonances. Read More

We propose a new search strategy for heavy top partners at the early stages of the LHC run-II, based on lepton-jet final states. Our results show that final states containing a boosted massive jet and a hard lepton, in addition to a top quark and possibly a forward jet, offer a new window to both detecting and measuring top partners of mass $\sim 2$ TeV. Our resulting signal significance is comparable or superior to the same sign di-lepton channels for top partner masses heavier than roughly 1 TeV. Read More

We explore the up flavor structure of composite pseudo Nambu-Goldstone-boson Higgs models, where we focus on the flavor anarchic minimal $SO(5)$ case. We identify the different sources of flavor violation in this framework and emphasise the differences from the anarchic Randall-Sundrum scenario. In particular, the fact that the flavor symmetry does not commute with the symmetries that stabilize the Higgs potential may constrain the flavor structure of the theory. Read More

2014Jul
Affiliations: 1Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2Université Libre de Bruxelles, 3Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4Université Libre de Bruxelles

In this paper, we describe a synthesis algorithm for safety specifications described as circuits. Our algorithm is based on fixpoint computations, abstraction and refinement, it uses binary decision diagrams as symbolic data structure. We evaluate our tool on the benchmarks provided by the organizers of the synthesis competition organized within the SYNT'14 workshop. Read More

2014Jul
Authors: T. Aaltonen1, R. Alon2, S. Amerio3, D. Amidei4, A. Anastassov5, A. Annovi6, J. Antos7, G. Apollinari8, J. A. Appel9, T. Arisawa10, A. Artikov11, J. Asaadi12, W. Ashmanskas13, B. Auerbach14, A. Aurisano15, F. Azfar16, W. Badgett17, T. Bae18, A. Barbaro-Galtieri19, V. E. Barnes20, B. A. Barnett21, P. Barria22, P. Bartos23, M. Bauce24, F. Bedeschi25, S. Behari26, G. Bellettini27, J. Bellinger28, D. Benjamin29, A. Beretvas30, A. Bhatti31, K. R. Bland32, B. Blumenfeld33, A. Bocci34, A. Bodek35, D. Bortoletto36, J. Boudreau37, A. Boveia38, L. Brigliadori39, C. Bromberg40, E. Brucken41, J. Budagov42, H. S. Budd43, K. Burkett44, G. Busetto45, P. Bussey46, P. Butti47, A. Buzatu48, A. Calamba49, S. Camarda50, M. Campanelli51, F. Canelli52, B. Carls53, D. Carlsmith54, R. Carosi55, S. Carrillo56, B. Casal57, M. Casarsa58, A. Castro59, P. Catastini60, D. Cauz61, V. Cavaliere62, A. Cerri63, L. Cerrito64, Y. C. Chen65, M. Chertok66, G. Chiarelli67, G. Chlachidze68, K. Cho69, D. Chokheli70, A. Clark71, C. Clarke72, M. E. Convery73, J. Conway74, M. Corbo75, M. Cordelli76, C. A. Cox77, D. J. Cox78, M. Cremonesi79, D. Cruz80, J. Cuevas81, R. Culbertson82, N. d'Ascenzo83, M. Datta84, P. de Barbaro85, L. Demortier86, M. Deninno87, M. D'Errico88, F. Devoto89, A. Di Canto90, B. Di Ruzza91, J. R. Dittmann92, S. Donati93, M. D'Onofrio94, M. Dorigo95, A. Driutti96, E. Duchovni97, K. Ebina98, R. Edgar99, A. Elagin100, R. Erbacher101, S. Errede102, B. Esham103, S. Farrington104, J. P. Fernandez Ramos105, R. Field106, G. Flanagan107, R. Forrest108, M. Franklin109, J. C. Freeman110, H. Frisch111, Y. Funakoshi112, C. Galloni113, A. F. Garfinkel114, P. Garosi115, H. Gerberich116, E. Gerchtein117, S. Giagu118, V. Giakoumopoulou119, K. Gibson120, C. M. Ginsburg121, N. Giokaris122, P. Giromini123, V. Glagolev124, D. Glenzinski125, M. Gold126, D. Goldin127, A. Golossanov128, G. Gomez129, G. Gomez-Ceballos130, M. Goncharov131, O. Gonzalez Lopez132, I. Gorelov133, A. T. Goshaw134, K. Goulianos135, E. Gramellini136, C. Grosso-Pilcher137, R. C. Group138, J. Guimaraes da Costa139, S. R. Hahn140, J. Y. Han141, F. Happacher142, K. Hara143, M. Hare144, R. F. Harr145, T. Harrington-Taber146, K. Hatakeyama147, C. Hays148, J. Heinrich149, M. Herndon150, A. Hocker151, Z. Hong152, W. Hopkins153, S. Hou154, R. E. Hughes155, U. Husemann156, M. Hussein157, J. Huston158, G. Introzzi159, M. Iori160, A. Ivanov161, E. James162, D. Jang163, B. Jayatilaka164, E. J. Jeon165, S. Jindariani166, M. Jones167, K. K. Joo168, S. Y. Jun169, T. R. Junk170, M. Kambeitz171, T. Kamon172, P. E. Karchin173, A. Kasmi174, Y. Kato175, W. Ketchum176, J. Keung177, B. Kilminster178, D. H. Kim179, H. S. Kim180, J. E. Kim181, M. J. Kim182, S. H. Kim183, S. B. Kim184, Y. J. Kim185, Y. K. Kim186, N. Kimura187, M. Kirby188, K. Knoepfel189, K. Kondo190, D. J. Kong191, J. Konigsberg192, A. V. Kotwal193, M. Kreps194, J. Kroll195, M. Kruse196, T. Kuhn197, M. Kurata198, A. T. Laasanen199, S. Lammel200, M. Lancaster201, K. Lannon202, G. Latino203, H. S. Lee204, J. S. Lee205, S. Leo206, S. Leone207, J. D. Lewis208, A. Limosani209, E. Lipeles210, A. Lister211, H. Liu212, Q. Liu213, T. Liu214, S. Lockwitz215, A. Loginov216, D. Lucchesi217, A. Luc218, J. Lueck219, P. Lujan220, P. Lukens221, G. Lungu222, J. Lys223, R. Lysak224, R. Madrak225, P. Maestro226, S. Malik227, G. Manca228, A. Manousakis-Katsikakis229, L. Marchese230, F. Margaroli231, P. Marino232, K. Matera233, M. E. Mattson234, A. Mazzacane235, P. Mazzanti236, R. McNulty237, A. Mehta238, P. Mehtala239, C. Mesropian240, T. Miao241, D. Mietlicki242, A. Mitra243, H. Miyake244, S. Moed245, N. Moggi246, C. S. Moon247, R. Moore248, M. J. Morello249, A. Mukherjee250, Th. Muller251, P. Murat252, M. Mussini253, J. Nachtman254, Y. Nagai255, J. Naganoma256, I. Nakano257, A. Napier258, J. Nett259, C. Neu260, T. Nigmanov261, L. Nodulman262, S. Y. Noh263, O. Norniella264, L. Oakes265, S. H. Oh266, Y. D. Oh267, I. Oksuzian268, T. Okusawa269, R. Orava270, L. Ortolan271, C. Pagliarone272, E. Palencia273, P. Palni274, V. Papadimitriou275, W. Parker276, G. Pauletta277, M. Paulini278, C. Paus279, G. Perez280, T. J. Phillips281, G. Piacentino282, E. Pianori283, J. Pilot284, K. Pitts285, C. Plager286, L. Pondrom287, S. Poprocki288, K. Potamianos289, A. Pranko290, F. Prokoshin291, F. Ptohos292, G. Punzi293, I. Redondo Fernandez294, P. Renton295, M. Rescigno296, F. Rimondi297, L. Ristori298, A. Robson299, T. Rodriguez300, S. Rolli301, M. Ronzani302, R. Roser303, J. L. Rosner304, F. Ruffini305, A. Ruiz306, J. Russ307, V. Rusu308, W. K. Sakumoto309, Y. Sakurai310, L. Santi311, K. Sato312, V. Saveliev313, A. Savoy-Navarro314, P. Schlabach315, E. E. Schmidt316, T. Schwarz317, L. Scodellaro318, F. Scuri319, S. Seidel320, Y. Seiya321, A. Semenov322, F. Sforza323, S. Z. Shalhout324, T. Shears325, P. F. Shepard326, M. Shimojima327, M. Shochet328, I. Shreyber-Tecker329, A. Simonenko330, P. Sinervo331, K. Sliwa332, J. R. Smith333, F. D. Snider334, H. Song335, V. Sorin336, R. St. Denis337, M. Stancari338, D. Stentz339, J. Strologas340, Y. Sudo341, A. Sukhanov342, I. Suslov343, K. Takemasa344, Y. Takeuchi345, J. Tang346, M. Tecchio347, P. K. Teng348, J. Thom349, E. Thomson350, V. Thukral351, D. Toback352, S. Tokar353, K. Tollefson354, T. Tomura355, D. Tonelli356, S. Torre357, D. Torretta358, P. Totaro359, M. Trovato360, F. Ukegawa361, S. Uozumi362, F. Vazquez363, G. Velev364, C. Vellidis365, C. Vernieri366, M. Vidal367, R. Vilar368, J. Vizan369, M. Vogel370, G. Volpi371, P. Wagner372, R. Wallny373, S. M. Wang374, D. Waters375, W. C. Wester III376, D. Whiteson377, A. B. Wicklund378, S. Wilbur379, H. H. Williams380, J. S. Wilson381, P. Wilson382, B. L. Winer383, P. Wittich384, S. Wolbers385, H. Wolfe386, T. Wright387, X. Wu388, Z. Wu389, K. Yamamoto390, D. Yamato391, T. Yang392, U. K. Yang393, Y. C. Yang394, W. -M. Yao395, G. P. Yeh396, K. Yi397, J. Yoh398, K. Yorita399, T. Yoshida400, G. B. Yu401, I. Yu402, A. M. Zanetti403, Y. Zeng404, C. Zhou405, S. Zucchelli406
Affiliations: 1The CDF Collaboration, 2The CDF Collaboration, 3The CDF Collaboration, 4The CDF Collaboration, 5The CDF Collaboration, 6The CDF Collaboration, 7The CDF Collaboration, 8The CDF Collaboration, 9The CDF Collaboration, 10The CDF Collaboration, 11The CDF Collaboration, 12The CDF Collaboration, 13The CDF Collaboration, 14The CDF Collaboration, 15The CDF Collaboration, 16The CDF Collaboration, 17The CDF Collaboration, 18The CDF Collaboration, 19The CDF Collaboration, 20The CDF Collaboration, 21The CDF Collaboration, 22The CDF Collaboration, 23The CDF Collaboration, 24The CDF Collaboration, 25The CDF Collaboration, 26The CDF Collaboration, 27The CDF Collaboration, 28The CDF Collaboration, 29The CDF Collaboration, 30The CDF Collaboration, 31The CDF Collaboration, 32The CDF Collaboration, 33The CDF Collaboration, 34The CDF Collaboration, 35The CDF Collaboration, 36The CDF Collaboration, 37The CDF Collaboration, 38The CDF Collaboration, 39The CDF Collaboration, 40The CDF Collaboration, 41The CDF Collaboration, 42The CDF Collaboration, 43The CDF Collaboration, 44The CDF Collaboration, 45The CDF Collaboration, 46The CDF Collaboration, 47The CDF Collaboration, 48The CDF Collaboration, 49The CDF Collaboration, 50The CDF Collaboration, 51The CDF Collaboration, 52The CDF Collaboration, 53The CDF Collaboration, 54The CDF Collaboration, 55The CDF Collaboration, 56The CDF Collaboration, 57The CDF Collaboration, 58The CDF Collaboration, 59The CDF Collaboration, 60The CDF Collaboration, 61The CDF Collaboration, 62The CDF Collaboration, 63The CDF Collaboration, 64The CDF Collaboration, 65The CDF Collaboration, 66The CDF Collaboration, 67The CDF Collaboration, 68The CDF Collaboration, 69The CDF Collaboration, 70The CDF Collaboration, 71The CDF Collaboration, 72The CDF Collaboration, 73The CDF Collaboration, 74The CDF Collaboration, 75The CDF Collaboration, 76The CDF Collaboration, 77The CDF Collaboration, 78The CDF Collaboration, 79The CDF Collaboration, 80The CDF Collaboration, 81The CDF Collaboration, 82The CDF Collaboration, 83The CDF Collaboration, 84The CDF Collaboration, 85The CDF Collaboration, 86The CDF Collaboration, 87The CDF Collaboration, 88The CDF Collaboration, 89The CDF Collaboration, 90The CDF Collaboration, 91The CDF Collaboration, 92The CDF Collaboration, 93The CDF Collaboration, 94The CDF Collaboration, 95The CDF Collaboration, 96The CDF Collaboration, 97The CDF Collaboration, 98The CDF Collaboration, 99The CDF Collaboration, 100The CDF Collaboration, 101The CDF Collaboration, 102The CDF Collaboration, 103The CDF Collaboration, 104The CDF Collaboration, 105The CDF Collaboration, 106The CDF Collaboration, 107The CDF Collaboration, 108The CDF Collaboration, 109The CDF Collaboration, 110The CDF Collaboration, 111The CDF Collaboration, 112The CDF Collaboration, 113The CDF Collaboration, 114The CDF Collaboration, 115The CDF Collaboration, 116The CDF Collaboration, 117The CDF Collaboration, 118The CDF Collaboration, 119The CDF Collaboration, 120The CDF Collaboration, 121The CDF Collaboration, 122The CDF Collaboration, 123The CDF Collaboration, 124The CDF Collaboration, 125The CDF Collaboration, 126The CDF Collaboration, 127The CDF Collaboration, 128The CDF Collaboration, 129The CDF Collaboration, 130The CDF Collaboration, 131The CDF Collaboration, 132The CDF Collaboration, 133The CDF Collaboration, 134The CDF Collaboration, 135The CDF Collaboration, 136The CDF Collaboration, 137The CDF Collaboration, 138The CDF Collaboration, 139The CDF Collaboration, 140The CDF Collaboration, 141The CDF Collaboration, 142The CDF Collaboration, 143The CDF Collaboration, 144The CDF Collaboration, 145The CDF Collaboration, 146The CDF Collaboration, 147The CDF Collaboration, 148The CDF Collaboration, 149The CDF Collaboration, 150The CDF Collaboration, 151The CDF Collaboration, 152The CDF Collaboration, 153The CDF Collaboration, 154The CDF Collaboration, 155The CDF Collaboration, 156The CDF Collaboration, 157The CDF Collaboration, 158The CDF Collaboration, 159The CDF Collaboration, 160The CDF Collaboration, 161The CDF Collaboration, 162The CDF Collaboration, 163The CDF Collaboration, 164The CDF Collaboration, 165The CDF Collaboration, 166The CDF Collaboration, 167The CDF Collaboration, 168The CDF Collaboration, 169The CDF Collaboration, 170The CDF Collaboration, 171The CDF Collaboration, 172The CDF Collaboration, 173The CDF Collaboration, 174The CDF Collaboration, 175The CDF Collaboration, 176The CDF Collaboration, 177The CDF Collaboration, 178The CDF Collaboration, 179The CDF Collaboration, 180The CDF Collaboration, 181The CDF Collaboration, 182The CDF Collaboration, 183The CDF Collaboration, 184The CDF Collaboration, 185The CDF Collaboration, 186The CDF Collaboration, 187The CDF Collaboration, 188The CDF Collaboration, 189The CDF Collaboration, 190The CDF Collaboration, 191The CDF Collaboration, 192The CDF Collaboration, 193The CDF Collaboration, 194The CDF Collaboration, 195The CDF Collaboration, 196The CDF Collaboration, 197The CDF Collaboration, 198The CDF Collaboration, 199The CDF Collaboration, 200The CDF Collaboration, 201The CDF Collaboration, 202The CDF Collaboration, 203The CDF Collaboration, 204The CDF Collaboration, 205The CDF Collaboration, 206The CDF Collaboration, 207The CDF Collaboration, 208The CDF Collaboration, 209The CDF Collaboration, 210The CDF Collaboration, 211The CDF Collaboration, 212The CDF Collaboration, 213The CDF Collaboration, 214The CDF Collaboration, 215The CDF Collaboration, 216The CDF Collaboration, 217The CDF Collaboration, 218The CDF Collaboration, 219The CDF Collaboration, 220The CDF Collaboration, 221The CDF Collaboration, 222The CDF Collaboration, 223The CDF Collaboration, 224The CDF Collaboration, 225The CDF Collaboration, 226The CDF Collaboration, 227The CDF Collaboration, 228The CDF Collaboration, 229The CDF Collaboration, 230The CDF Collaboration, 231The CDF Collaboration, 232The CDF Collaboration, 233The CDF Collaboration, 234The CDF Collaboration, 235The CDF Collaboration, 236The CDF Collaboration, 237The CDF Collaboration, 238The CDF Collaboration, 239The CDF Collaboration, 240The CDF Collaboration, 241The CDF Collaboration, 242The CDF Collaboration, 243The CDF Collaboration, 244The CDF Collaboration, 245The CDF Collaboration, 246The CDF Collaboration, 247The CDF Collaboration, 248The CDF Collaboration, 249The CDF Collaboration, 250The CDF Collaboration, 251The CDF Collaboration, 252The CDF Collaboration, 253The CDF Collaboration, 254The CDF Collaboration, 255The CDF Collaboration, 256The CDF Collaboration, 257The CDF Collaboration, 258The CDF Collaboration, 259The CDF Collaboration, 260The CDF Collaboration, 261The CDF Collaboration, 262The CDF Collaboration, 263The CDF Collaboration, 264The CDF Collaboration, 265The CDF Collaboration, 266The CDF Collaboration, 267The CDF Collaboration, 268The CDF Collaboration, 269The CDF Collaboration, 270The CDF Collaboration, 271The CDF Collaboration, 272The CDF Collaboration, 273The CDF Collaboration, 274The CDF Collaboration, 275The CDF Collaboration, 276The CDF Collaboration, 277The CDF Collaboration, 278The CDF Collaboration, 279The CDF Collaboration, 280The CDF Collaboration, 281The CDF Collaboration, 282The CDF Collaboration, 283The CDF Collaboration, 284The CDF Collaboration, 285The CDF Collaboration, 286The CDF Collaboration, 287The CDF Collaboration, 288The CDF Collaboration, 289The CDF Collaboration, 290The CDF Collaboration, 291The CDF Collaboration, 292The CDF Collaboration, 293The CDF Collaboration, 294The CDF Collaboration, 295The CDF Collaboration, 296The CDF Collaboration, 297The CDF Collaboration, 298The CDF Collaboration, 299The CDF Collaboration, 300The CDF Collaboration, 301The CDF Collaboration, 302The CDF Collaboration, 303The CDF Collaboration, 304The CDF Collaboration, 305The CDF Collaboration, 306The CDF Collaboration, 307The CDF Collaboration, 308The CDF Collaboration, 309The CDF Collaboration, 310The CDF Collaboration, 311The CDF Collaboration, 312The CDF Collaboration, 313The CDF Collaboration, 314The CDF Collaboration, 315The CDF Collaboration, 316The CDF Collaboration, 317The CDF Collaboration, 318The CDF Collaboration, 319The CDF Collaboration, 320The CDF Collaboration, 321The CDF Collaboration, 322The CDF Collaboration, 323The CDF Collaboration, 324The CDF Collaboration, 325The CDF Collaboration, 326The CDF Collaboration, 327The CDF Collaboration, 328The CDF Collaboration, 329The CDF Collaboration, 330The CDF Collaboration, 331The CDF Collaboration, 332The CDF Collaboration, 333The CDF Collaboration, 334The CDF Collaboration, 335The CDF Collaboration, 336The CDF Collaboration, 337The CDF Collaboration, 338The CDF Collaboration, 339The CDF Collaboration, 340The CDF Collaboration, 341The CDF Collaboration, 342The CDF Collaboration, 343The CDF Collaboration, 344The CDF Collaboration, 345The CDF Collaboration, 346The CDF Collaboration, 347The CDF Collaboration, 348The CDF Collaboration, 349The CDF Collaboration, 350The CDF Collaboration, 351The CDF Collaboration, 352The CDF Collaboration, 353The CDF Collaboration, 354The CDF Collaboration, 355The CDF Collaboration, 356The CDF Collaboration, 357The CDF Collaboration, 358The CDF Collaboration, 359The CDF Collaboration, 360The CDF Collaboration, 361The CDF Collaboration, 362The CDF Collaboration, 363The CDF Collaboration, 364The CDF Collaboration, 365The CDF Collaboration, 366The CDF Collaboration, 367The CDF Collaboration, 368The CDF Collaboration, 369The CDF Collaboration, 370The CDF Collaboration, 371The CDF Collaboration, 372The CDF Collaboration, 373The CDF Collaboration, 374The CDF Collaboration, 375The CDF Collaboration, 376The CDF Collaboration, 377The CDF Collaboration, 378The CDF Collaboration, 379The CDF Collaboration, 380The CDF Collaboration, 381The CDF Collaboration, 382The CDF Collaboration, 383The CDF Collaboration, 384The CDF Collaboration, 385The CDF Collaboration, 386The CDF Collaboration, 387The CDF Collaboration, 388The CDF Collaboration, 389The CDF Collaboration, 390The CDF Collaboration, 391The CDF Collaboration, 392The CDF Collaboration, 393The CDF Collaboration, 394The CDF Collaboration, 395The CDF Collaboration, 396The CDF Collaboration, 397The CDF Collaboration, 398The CDF Collaboration, 399The CDF Collaboration, 400The CDF Collaboration, 401The CDF Collaboration, 402The CDF Collaboration, 403The CDF Collaboration, 404The CDF Collaboration, 405The CDF Collaboration, 406The CDF Collaboration

Results of a study of the substructure of the highest transverse momentum (pT) jets observed by the CDF collaboration are presented. Events containing at least one jet with pT > 400 GeV/c in a sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.95 inverse fb, collected in 1. Read More

We show that both flavor-conserving and flavor-violating Yukawa couplings of the Higgs boson to first- and second-generation quarks can be probed by measuring rare decays of the form h->MV, where M denotes a vector meson and V indicates either gamma, W or Z. We calculate the branching ratios for these processes in both the Standard Model and its possible extensions. We discuss the experimental prospects for their observation. Read More

OpenID is a standard decentralized initiative aimed at allowing Internet users to use the same personal account to access different services. Since it does not rely on any central authority, it is hard for such users or other entities to validate the trust level of each entity deployed in the system. Some research has been conducted to handle this issue, defining a reputation framework to determine the trust level of a relying party based on past experiences. Read More

We define a lepton-based asymmetry in semi-leptonic ttbar production at the LHC. We show that the ratio of this lepton-based asymmetry and the ttbar charge asymmetry, measured as a function of the lepton transverse momentum or the ttbar invariant mass is a robust observable in the Standard Model. It is stable against higher order corrections and mis-modeling effects. Read More

We present a procedure for tagging boosted semi-leptonic $t\bar t$ events based on the Template Overlap Method. We introduce a new formulation of the template overlap function for leptonically decaying boosted tops and show that it can be used to compensate for the loss of background rejection due to reduction of b-tagging efficiency at high $p_T$. A study of asymmetric top pair production due to higher order effects shows that our approach improves the resolution of the truth level kinematic distributions. Read More

We study the implications of a large degree of compositeness for the light generation quarks in composite pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson Higgs models. We focus in particular on viable scenarios where the right-handed up-type quarks have a sizable mixing with the strong dynamics. For concreteness we assume the latter to be characterized by an SO(5)/SO(4) symmetry with fermionic resonances in the SO(4) singlet and fourplet representations. Read More

This report represents the response of the Intensity Frontier Quark Flavor Physics Working Group to the Snowmass charge. We summarize the current status of quark flavor physics and identify many exciting future opportunities for studying the properties of strange, charm, and bottom quarks. The ability of these studies to reveal the effects of new physics at high mass scales make them an essential ingredient in a well-balanced experimental particle physics program. Read More