C. Englert

C. Englert
Are you C. Englert?

Claim your profile, edit publications, add additional information:

Contact Details

Name
C. Englert
Affiliation
Location

Pubs By Year

Pub Categories

 
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (50)
 
High Energy Physics - Experiment (30)
 
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (2)
 
High Energy Physics - Lattice (2)

Publications Authored By C. Englert

We perform a comparative study of the reach of future $e^+e^-$ collider options for the scale of non-resonant new physics effects in the top quark sector, phrased in the language of higher-dimensional operators. Our focus is on the electroweak top quark pair production process $e^+e^- \to Z^*/\gamma \to t\bar t $, and we study benchmark scenarios at the ILC and CLIC. We find that both are able to constrain mass scales up to the few TeV range in the most sensitive cases, improving by orders of magnitude on the forecasted capabilities of the LHC. Read More

We investigate a recently proposed UV-complete composite Higgs scenario in the light of the first LHC runs. The model is based on a SU(4) gauge group with global flavour symmetry breaking SU(5)$\to$ SO(5), giving rise to pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons in addition to the Higgs doublet. This includes a real and a complex electroweak triplet with exotic electric charges. Read More

We provide a comprehensive analysis of the power of including top quark-polarisation information to kinematically challenging $t\bar t$ resonance searches, for which ATLAS and CMS start losing sensitivity. Following the general modeling and analysis strategies pursued by the experiments, we analyse the semi-leptonic and the di-lepton $t\bar t$ channels and show that including polarisation information can lead to large improvements in the limit setting procedures with large data sets. This will allow us to set limits for parameter choices where sensitivity from $m(t\bar t)$ is not sufficient. Read More

Several UV complete models of physics beyond the Standard Model are currently under scrutiny, their low-energy dynamics being compared with the experimental data from the LHC. Lattice simulations can play a role in these studies by providing a first principles computations of the low-energy constants that describe this low-energy dynamics. In this work, we study in detail a specific model recently proposed by Ferretti, and discuss the potential impact of lattice calculations. Read More

${\rm W}^\pm {\rm W}^\pm {\rm H}$ production at hadron colliders through vector boson scattering is a so far unconsidered process, which leads to a clean signature of two same-sign charged leptons and two widely separated jets. This process is sensitive to the ${\rm HHH}$ and ${\rm WWHH}$ couplings and any deviation of these couplings from their SM predictions serves as direct evidence of new physics beyond the SM. In this paper we perform a Monte Carlo study of this process for the $\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV LHC and a $100$ TeV pp-collider, and provide projections of the constraints on the triple-Higgs and ${\rm WWHH}$ quartic couplings for these environments. Read More

We discuss a global fit of top quark BSM couplings, phrased in the model-independent language of higher-dimensional effective operators, to the currently available data from the LHC and Tevatron. We examine the interplay between inclusive and differential measurements, and the complementarity of LHC and Tevatron results. We conclude with a discussion of projections for improvement over LHC Run II. Read More

Perturbative probability conservation provides a strong constraint on the presence of new interactions of the Higgs boson. In this work we consider CP violating Higgs interactions in conjunction with unitarity constraints in the gauge-Higgs and fermion-Higgs sectors. Injecting signal strength measurements of the recently discovered Higgs boson allows us to make concrete and correlated predictions of how CP-violation in the Higgs sector can be directly constrained through collider searches for either characteristic new states or tell-tale enhancements in multi-Higgs processes. Read More

2016Oct
Authors: D. de Florian1, C. Grojean2, F. Maltoni3, C. Mariotti4, A. Nikitenko5, M. Pieri6, P. Savard7, M. Schumacher8, R. Tanaka9, R. Aggleton10, M. Ahmad11, B. Allanach12, C. Anastasiou13, W. Astill14, S. Badger15, M. Badziak16, J. Baglio17, E. Bagnaschi18, A. Ballestrero19, A. Banfi20, D. Barducci21, M. Beckingham22, C. Becot23, G. Bélanger24, J. Bellm25, N. Belyaev26, F. U. Bernlochner27, C. Beskidt28, A. Biekötter29, F. Bishara30, W. Bizon31, N. E. Bomark32, M. Bonvini33, S. Borowka34, V. Bortolotto35, S. Boselli36, F. J. Botella37, R. Boughezal38, G. C. Branco39, J. Brehmer40, L. Brenner41, S. Bressler42, I. Brivio43, A. Broggio44, H. Brun45, G. Buchalla46, C. D. Burgard47, A. Calandri48, L. Caminada49, R. Caminal Armadans50, F. Campanario51, J. Campbell52, F. Caola53, C. M. Carloni Calame54, S. Carrazza55, A. Carvalho56, M. Casolino57, O. Cata58, A. Celis59, F. Cerutti60, N. Chanon61, M. Chen62, X. Chen63, B. Chokoufé Nejad64, N. Christensen65, M. Ciuchini66, R. Contino67, T. Corbett68, D. Curtin69, M. Dall'Osso70, A. David71, S. Dawson72, J. de Blas73, W. de Boer74, P. de Castro Manzano75, C. Degrande76, R. L. Delgado77, F. Demartin78, A. Denner79, B. Di Micco80, R. Di Nardo81, S. Dittmaier82, A. Dobado83, T. Dorigo84, F. A. Dreyer85, M. Dührssen86, C. Duhr87, F. Dulat88, K. Ecker89, K. Ellis90, U. Ellwanger91, C. Englert92, D. Espriu93, A. Falkowski94, L. Fayard95, R. Feger96, G. Ferrera97, A. Ferroglia98, N. Fidanza99, T. Figy100, M. Flechl101, D. Fontes102, S. Forte103, P. Francavilla104, E. Franco105, R. Frederix106, A. Freitas107, F. F. Freitas108, F. Frensch109, S. Frixione110, B. Fuks111, E. Furlan112, S. Gadatsch113, J. Gao114, Y. Gao115, M. V. Garzelli116, T. Gehrmann117, R. Gerosa118, M. Ghezzi119, D. Ghosh120, S. Gieseke121, D. Gillberg122, G. F. Giudice123, E. W. N. Glover124, F. Goertz125, D. Gonçalves126, J. Gonzalez-Fraile127, M. Gorbahn128, S. Gori129, C. A. Gottardo130, M. Gouzevitch131, P. Govoni132, D. Gray133, M. Grazzini134, N. Greiner135, A. Greljo136, J. Grigo137, A. V. Gritsan138, R. Gröber139, S. Guindon140, H. E. Haber141, C. Han142, T. Han143, R. Harlander144, M. A. Harrendorf145, H. B. Hartanto146, C. Hays147, S. Heinemeyer148, G. Heinrich149, M. Herrero150, F. Herzog151, B. Hespel152, V. Hirschi153, S. Hoeche154, S. Honeywell155, S. J. Huber156, C. Hugonie157, J. Huston158, A. Ilnicka159, G. Isidori160, B. Jäger161, M. Jaquier162, S. P. Jones163, A. Juste164, S. Kallweit165, A. Kaluza166, A. Kardos167, A. Karlberg168, Z. Kassabov169, N. Kauer170, D. I. Kazakov171, M. Kerner172, W. Kilian173, F. Kling174, K. Köneke175, R. Kogler176, R. Konoplich177, S. Kortner178, S. Kraml179, C. Krause180, F. Krauss181, M. Krawczyk182, A. Kulesza183, S. Kuttimalai184, R. Lane185, A. Lazopoulos186, G. Lee187, P. Lenzi188, I. M. Lewis189, Y. Li190, S. Liebler191, J. Lindert192, X. Liu193, Z. Liu194, F. J. Llanes-Estrada195, H. E. Logan196, D. Lopez-Val197, I. Low198, G. Luisoni199, P. Maierhöfer200, E. Maina201, B. Mansoulié202, H. Mantler203, M. Mantoani204, A. C. Marini205, V. I. Martinez Outschoorn206, S. Marzani207, D. Marzocca208, A. Massironi209, K. Mawatari210, J. Mazzitelli211, A. McCarn212, B. Mellado213, K. Melnikov214, S. B. Menari215, L. Merlo216, C. Meyer217, P. Milenovic218, K. Mimasu219, S. Mishima220, B. Mistlberger221, S. -O. Moch222, A. Mohammadi223, P. F. Monni224, G. Montagna225, M. Moreno Llácer226, N. Moretti227, S. Moretti228, L. Motyka229, A. Mück230, M. Mühlleitner231, S. Munir232, P. Musella233, P. Nadolsky234, D. Napoletano235, M. Nebot236, C. Neu237, M. Neubert238, R. Nevzorov239, O. Nicrosini240, J. Nielsen241, K. Nikolopoulos242, J. M. No243, C. O'Brien244, T. Ohl245, C. Oleari246, T. Orimoto247, D. Pagani248, C. E. Pandini249, A. Papaefstathiou250, A. S. Papanastasiou251, G. Passarino252, B. D. Pecjak253, M. Pelliccioni254, G. Perez255, L. Perrozzi256, F. Petriello257, G. Petrucciani258, E. Pianori259, F. Piccinini260, M. Pierini261, A. Pilkington262, S. Plätzer263, T. Plehn264, R. Podskubka265, C. T. Potter266, S. Pozzorini267, K. Prokofiev268, A. Pukhov269, I. Puljak270, M. Queitsch-Maitland271, J. Quevillon272, D. Rathlev273, M. Rauch274, E. Re275, M. N. Rebelo276, D. Rebuzzi277, L. Reina278, C. Reuschle279, J. Reuter280, M. Riembau281, F. Riva282, A. Rizzi283, T. Robens284, R. Röntsch285, J. Rojo286, J. C. Romão287, N. Rompotis288, J. Roskes289, R. Roth290, G. P. Salam291, R. Salerno292, R. Santos293, V. Sanz294, J. J. Sanz-Cillero295, H. Sargsyan296, U. Sarica297, P. Schichtel298, J. Schlenk299, T. Schmidt300, C. Schmitt301, M. Schönherr302, U. Schubert303, M. Schulze304, S. Sekula305, M. Sekulla306, E. Shabalina307, H. S. Shao308, J. Shelton309, C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous310, S. Y. Shim311, F. Siegert312, A. Signer313, J. P. Silva314, L. Silvestrini315, M. Sjodahl316, P. Slavich317, M. Slawinska318, L. Soffi319, M. Spannowsky320, C. Speckner321, D. M. Sperka322, M. Spira323, O. Stål324, F. Staub325, T. Stebel326, T. Stefaniak327, M. Steinhauser328, I. W. Stewart329, M. J. Strassler330, J. Streicher331, D. M. Strom332, S. Su333, X. Sun334, F. J. Tackmann335, K. Tackmann336, A. M. Teixeira337, R. Teixeira de Lima338, V. Theeuwes339, R. Thorne340, D. Tommasini341, P. Torrielli342, M. Tosi343, F. Tramontano344, Z. Trócsányi345, M. Trott346, I. Tsinikos347, M. Ubiali348, P. Vanlaer349, W. Verkerke350, A. Vicini351, L. Viliani352, E. Vryonidou353, D. Wackeroth354, C. E. M. Wagner355, J. Wang356, S. Wayand357, G. Weiglein358, C. Weiss359, M. Wiesemann360, C. Williams361, J. Winter362, D. Winterbottom363, R. Wolf364, M. Xiao365, L. L. Yang366, R. Yohay367, S. P. Y. Yuen368, G. Zanderighi369, M. Zaro370, D. Zeppenfeld371, R. Ziegler372, T. Zirke373, J. Zupan374
Affiliations: 1eds., 2eds., 3eds., 4eds., 5eds., 6eds., 7eds., 8eds., 9eds., 10The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 11The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 12The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 13The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 14The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 15The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 16The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 17The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 18The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 19The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 20The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 21The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 22The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 23The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 24The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 25The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 26The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 27The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 28The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 29The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 30The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 31The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 32The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 33The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 34The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 35The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 36The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 37The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 38The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 39The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 40The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 41The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 42The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 43The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 44The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 45The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 46The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 47The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 48The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 49The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 50The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 51The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 52The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 53The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 54The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 55The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 56The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 57The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 58The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 59The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 60The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 61The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 62The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 63The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 64The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 65The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 66The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 67The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 68The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 69The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 70The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 71The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 72The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 73The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 74The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 75The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 76The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 77The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 78The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 79The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 80The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 81The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 82The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 83The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 84The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 85The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 86The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 87The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 88The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 89The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 90The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 91The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 92The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 93The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 94The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 95The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 96The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 97The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 98The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 99The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 100The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 101The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 102The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 103The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 104The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 105The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 106The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 107The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 108The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 109The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 110The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 111The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 112The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 113The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 114The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 115The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 116The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 117The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 118The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 119The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 120The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 121The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 122The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 123The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 124The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 125The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 126The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 127The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 128The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 129The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 130The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 131The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 132The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 133The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 134The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 135The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 136The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 137The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 138The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 139The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 140The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 141The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 142The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 143The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 144The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 145The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 146The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 147The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 148The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 149The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 150The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 151The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 152The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 153The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 154The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 155The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 156The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 157The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 158The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 159The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 160The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 161The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 162The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 163The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 164The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 165The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 166The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 167The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 168The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 169The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 170The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 171The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 172The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 173The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 174The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 175The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 176The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 177The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 178The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 179The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 180The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 181The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 182The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 183The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 184The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 185The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 186The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 187The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 188The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 189The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 190The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 191The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 192The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 193The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 194The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 195The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 196The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 197The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 198The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 199The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 200The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 201The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 202The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 203The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 204The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 205The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 206The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 207The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 208The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 209The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 210The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 211The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 212The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 213The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 214The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 215The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 216The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 217The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 218The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 219The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 220The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 221The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 222The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 223The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 224The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 225The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 226The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 227The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 228The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 229The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 230The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 231The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 232The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 233The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 234The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 235The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 236The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 237The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 238The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 239The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 240The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 241The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 242The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 243The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 244The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 245The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 246The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 247The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 248The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 249The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 250The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 251The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 252The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 253The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 254The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 255The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 256The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 257The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 258The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 259The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 260The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 261The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 262The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 263The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 264The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 265The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 266The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 267The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 268The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 269The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 270The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 271The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 272The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 273The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 274The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 275The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 276The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 277The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 278The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 279The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 280The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 281The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 282The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 283The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 284The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 285The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 286The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 287The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 288The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 289The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 290The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 291The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 292The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 293The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 294The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 295The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 296The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 297The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 298The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 299The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 300The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 301The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 302The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 303The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 304The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 305The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 306The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 307The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 308The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 309The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 310The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 311The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 312The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 313The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 314The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 315The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 316The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 317The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 318The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 319The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 320The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 321The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 322The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 323The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 324The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 325The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 326The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 327The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 328The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 329The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 330The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 331The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 332The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 333The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 334The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 335The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 336The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 337The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 338The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 339The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 340The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 341The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 342The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 343The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 344The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 345The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 346The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 347The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 348The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 349The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 350The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 351The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 352The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 353The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 354The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 355The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 356The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 357The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 358The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 359The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 360The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 361The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 362The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 363The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 364The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 365The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 366The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 367The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 368The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 369The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 370The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 371The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 372The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 373The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, 374The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group

This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay branching ratios, parton distribution functions, and off-shell Higgs boson production and interference effects. Read More

Non-minimal composite Higgs scenarios can contain exotic Higgs states which, if getting observed at the Large Hadron Collider, will help to constrain the underlying UV structure of the strong dynamics. Doubly charged Higgs bosons are well-motivated scalar degrees of freedom in this context. Their phenomenology in typical composite scenarios can differ from well-established Higgs triplet extensions of the SM. Read More

In this paper we argue that monojet and monophoton searches can be a sensitive test of very highly ionizing particles such as particles with charges $\gtrsim 150e$ and more generally particles that do not reach the outer parts of the detector. 8 TeV monojet data from the CMS experiment excludes such objects with masses in the range $\lesssim 650~{\text{GeV}}$ and charges $\gtrsim 100e$. This nicely complements searches for highly ionizing objects at ALICE, ATLAS, CMS and LHCb. Read More

We investigate the prospects to systematically improve generic effective field theory-based searches for new physics in the top sector during LHC run 2 as well as the high luminosity phase. In particular, we assess the benefits of high momentum transfer final states on top EFT-fit as a function of systematic uncertainties in comparison with sensitivity expected from fully-resolved analyses focusing on $t\bar t$ production. We find that constraints are typically driven by fully-resolved selections, while boosted top quarks can serve to break degeneracies in the global fit. Read More

Dark sectors with strong interactions have received considerable interest. Assuming the existence of a minimally coupled dark sector which runs to strong interactions in the infrared, we address the question whether the scaling behavior of this dark sector can be observed in missing energy signatures at present and future hadron colliders. We compare these findings to the concrete case of self-interacting dark matter and demonstrate that the energy dependence of high-momentum transfer final states can in principle be used to gain information about the UV structure of hidden sectors at future hadron colliders, subject to large improvements in systematic uncertainties, which could complement proof-of-principle lattice investigations. Read More

We present the activities of the 'New Physics' working group for the 'Physics at TeV Colliders' workshop (Les Houches, France, 1-19 June, 2015). Our report includes new physics studies connected with the Higgs boson and its properties, direct search strategies, reinterpretation of the LHC results in the building of viable models and new computational tool developments. Important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC and new assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC are also considered. Read More

The ultraviolet structure of $s$-channel mediator dark matter simplified models at hadron colliders is considered. In terms of commonly studied $s$-channel mediator simplified models it is argued that at arbitrarily high energies the perturbative description of dark matter production in high energy scattering at hadron colliders will break down in a number of cases. This is analogous to the well documented breakdown of an EFT description of dark matter collider production. Read More

Scalar dark energy fields that couple to the Standard Model can give rise to observable signatures at the LHC. In this work we show that $t\bar t+$missing energy and mono-jet searches are suitable probes in the limit where the dark energy scalar is stable on collider distances. We discuss the prospects of distinguishing the dark energy character of new physics signals from dark matter signatures and the possibility of probing the self-interactions of the dark energy sector. Read More

We re-investigate electroweak signal-background interference in associated Higgs production via gluon fusion in the presence of new physics in the top-Higgs sector. Considering the full final state $pp \to b \bar b \ell^+\ell^-$ ($\ell=e,\mu$), we discuss how new physics in the top-Higgs sector that enhances the $ZZ$ component can leave footprints in the $HZ$ limit setting. In passing we investigate the phenomenology of a class of new physics interactions that can be genuinely studied in this process. Read More

We perform an up-to-date global fit of top quark effective theory to experimental data from the Tevatron, and from LHC Runs I and II. Experimental data includes total cross-sections up to 13 TeV, as well as differential distributions, for both single top and pair production. We also include the top quark width, charge asymmetries, and polarisation information from top decay products. Read More

We study Higgs production through weak boson fusion with subsequent decay to bottom quarks. By combining jet substructure techniques and matrix element methods in different limits we motivate this channel as a probe of the bottom-Yukawa interactions in the boosted regime. In particular we ameliorate the "no-go" results of cut-and-count analyses in this channel. Read More

Due to the absence of tantalising hints for new physics during the LHC's run 1, the extension of the Higgs sector by dimension six operators will provide the new phenomenological standard for searches of non-resonant extensions of the Standard Model. Using all dominant and subdominant Higgs production mechanisms at the LHC, we compute the constraints on Higgs physics-relevant dimension six operators in a global and correlated fit. We show in how far these constraints can be improved by new Higgs channels becoming accessible at higher energy and luminosity, both through inclusive cross sections as well as through highly sensitive differential distributions. Read More

In this paper we present a global fit of beyond the Standard Model (BSM) dimension six operators relevant to the top quark sector to currently available data. Experimental measurements include parton-level top-pair and single top production from the LHC and the Tevatron. Higher order QCD corrections are modelled using differential and global K-factors, and we use novel fast-fitting techniques developed in the context of Monte Carlo event generator tuning to perform the fit. Read More

The search for di-Higgs production at the LHC in order to set limits on Higgs trilinear coupling and constraints on new physics is one of the main motivations for the LHC high luminosity phase. Recent experimental analyses suggest that such analyses will only be successful if information from a range of channels is included. We therefore investigate di-Higgs production in association with two hadronic jets and give a detailed discussion of both the gluon- and weak boson fusion contributions, with a particular emphasis on the phenomenology with modified Higgs trilinear and quartic gauge couplings. Read More

Disformally coupled, light scalar fields arise in many of the theories of dark energy and modified gravity that attempt to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. They have proved difficult to constrain with precision tests of gravity because they do not give rise to fifth forces around static non-relativistic sources. However, because the scalar field couples derivatively to standard model matter, measurements at high energy particle colliders offer an effective way to constrain and potentially detect a disformally coupled scalar field. Read More

The correlation of on- and off-shell Higgs boson production at the LHC in $gg \to h^* \to ZZ$ to bound the Higgs width, under specific model-dependent assumptions, has recently received a lot of attention. As off-shell cross section measurements in this channel suffer from a small signal yield, large backgrounds, and theoretical uncertainties, we propose an alternative complementary constraint which is only possible through the combination of LEP and LHC measurements. Previous precision electroweak measurements at LEP allow for the determination of indirect constraints on Higgs couplings to vector bosons by considering one-loop processes involving virtual Higgs exchange. Read More

A comprehensive review of physics at an e+e- Linear Collider in the energy range of sqrt{s}=92 GeV--3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low energy as well as astroparticle physics.The report focuses in particular on Higgs boson, Top quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the Standard Model physics such as Supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analyzed as well. Read More

If the recently discovered Higgs boson's couplings deviate from the Standard Model expectation, we may anticipate new resonant physics in the weak boson fusion channels resulting from high scale unitarity sum rules of longitudinal gauge boson scattering. Motivated by excesses in analyses of multi-leptons+missing energy+jets final states during run 1, we perform a phenomenological investigation of these channels at the LHC bounded by current Higgs coupling constraints. Such an approach constrains the prospects to observe such new physics at the LHC as a function of very few and generic parameters and allows the investigation of the strong requirement of probability conservation in the electroweak sector to high energies. Read More

Top quark loops in Higgs production via gluon fusion at large invariant final state masses can induce important interference effects in searches for additional Higgs bosons as predicted in, e.g., Higgs portal scenarios and the MSSM when the heavy scalar is broad or the final state resolution is poor. Read More

An important physics goal of a possible next-generation high-energy hadron collider will be precision characterisation of the Higgs sector and electroweak symmetry breaking. A crucial part of understanding the nature of electroweak symmetry breaking is measuring the Higgs self-interactions. We study dihiggs production in proton-proton collisions at 100 TeV centre of mass energy in order to estimate the sensitivity such a machine would have to variations in the trilinear Higgs coupling around the Standard Model expectation. Read More

Proposals of measuring the off-shell Higgs contributions and first measurements at the LHC have electrified the Higgs phenomenology community for two reasons: Firstly, probing interactions at high invariant masses and momentum transfers is intrinsically sensitive to new physics beyond the Standard Model, irrespective of a resonant or non-resonant character of a particular BSM scenario. Secondly, under specific assumptions a class of models exists for which the off-shell coupling measurement together with a measurement of the on-shell signal strength can be re-interpreted in terms of a bound on the total Higgs boson width. In this paper, we provide a first step towards a classification of the models for which a total width measurement is viable and we discuss examples of BSM models for which the off-shell coupling measurement can be important in either constraining or even discovering new physics in the upcoming LHC runs. Read More

Searches for multi-Higgs final states allow to constrain parameters of the SM (or extensions thereof) that directly relate to the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking. Multi-Higgs production cross sections, however, are small and the phenomenologically accessible final states are challenging to isolate in the busy multi-jet hadron collider environment of the LHC run 2. This makes the necessity to extend the list of potentially observable production mechanisms obvious. Read More

If the LHC run 2 will not provide conclusive hints for new resonant Physics beyond the Standard Model, dedicated and consistent search strategies at high momentum transfers will become the focus of searches for anticipated deviations from the Standard Model expectation. We discuss the phenomenological importance of QCD and electroweak corrections in bounding higher dimensional operators when analysing energy-dependent differential distributions. In particular, we study the impact of RGE-induced operator running and mixing effects on measurements performed in the context of an Effective Field Theory extension of the SM. Read More

In the Standard Model the Higgs coupling to gluons is almost entirely induced by top quark loops. We derive the logarithmic structure of Higgs production in association with two jets. Just like in the one-jet case the transverse momentum distributions exhibit logarithms of the top quark mass and can be used to test the nature of the loop-induced Higgs coupling to gluons. Read More

We present the activities of the "New Physics" working group for the "Physics at TeV Colliders" workshop (Les Houches, France, 3--21 June, 2013). Our report includes new computational tool developments, studies of the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on new physics, important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC, new studies of flavour aspects of new physics, and assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC. Read More

Indirect constraints on the total Higgs width $\Gamma_h$ from correlating Higgs signal strengths with cross section measurements in the off-shell region for $p(g)p(g)\to 4\ell$ production have received considerable attention recently, and the CMS collaboration have published a first measurement. We revisit this analysis from a new physics and unitarity constraints perspective and conclude that limits on $\Gamma_h$ obtained in this fashion are not reliable unless we make model-specific assumptions, which cannot be justified at the current stage of the LHC programme. Relaxing the $\Gamma_h$ interpretation, we discuss the merits of high invariant mass cross section measurements in the context of Higgs CP analyses, higher dimensional operator testing, and resolved new physics in the light of electroweak precision constraints beyond effective theory limitations. Read More

The measured properties of the recently discovered Higgs boson are in good agreement with predictions from the Standard Model. However, small deviations in the Higgs couplings may manifest themselves once the currently large uncertainties will be improved as part of the LHC program and at a future Higgs factory. We review typical new physics scenarios that lead to observable modifications of the Higgs interactions. Read More

After the discovery of the 125 GeV scalar boson with gauge properties similar to the Standard Model Higgs, the search for beyond the SM interactions will focus on studying the discovered particles' coupling properties more precisely and shedding light on the relation of fermion masses with the electroweak vacuum. The large mass of the top quark and the SM-predicted order one top Yukawa coupling is a natural candidate for BSM physics, though experimentally challenging to constrain. In this paper, we argue that investigating angular correlations in $pp\to tHj$ production provides an excellent handle to constrain the top Yukawa coupling $y_t$ via direct measurements, even when we focus on rare exclusive final states. Read More

The top quark, being the heaviest particle of the Standard Model, is a prime candidate of where physics beyond the SM might currently hide before our eyes. There are many natural extensions of the SM that rely on top compositeness, and the top quark could follow the paradigm of revealing a substructure when it is probed at high enough momentum transfers. Observing high $p_T$ top final states naturally drives us towards boosted hadronic analyses that can be tackled efficiently with jet substructure techniques. Read More

Analyses of boosted Higgs bosons from associated production comprise some of the main search channels for the Higgs boson at the LHC. The gluon-initiated $gg\to hZ$ subprocess has largely been ignored in phenomenological analyses of boosted associated production although this contribution is sizable as the $p_T$ spectrum for this process is maximised in the boosted regime due to the top quark loop threshold. In this paper, we discuss this contribution to boosted $pp\to hZ$ analyses in detail. Read More

A measurement of the $hh+2j$ channel at the LHC would be particularly thrilling for electroweak physics. It is not only the leading process which is sensitive to the $W^+W^- hh$ and $ZZhh$ interactions, but also provides a potentially clear window to study the electroweak symmetry-breaking sector by probing Higgs-Goldstone interactions through the weak boson fusion component of the scattering process. Until now, a phenomenologically complete analysis of this channel has been missing. Read More

Higgs boson self-interactions can be investigated via di-Higgs ($pp\to hh+X$) production at the LHC. With a small ${\cal{O}}(30)$ fb Standard Model production cross section, and a large $t\bar t$ background, this measurement has been considered challenging, even at a luminosity-upgraded LHC. We demonstrate that by using simple kinematic bounding variables, of the sort already employed in existing LHC searches, the dominant $t\bar t$ background can be largely eliminated. Read More

We develop a phenomenological formalism for mixing effects between the Standard Model and hidden-sector fields, motivated by dark matter in the Universe as well as string theories. The scheme includes multiple Higgs-portal interactions in the scalar sector as well as multiple gauge-kinetic mixings in the abelian gauge sector. While some of the mixing effects can be cast in closed form, other elements can be controlled analytically only by means of perturbative expansions in the ratio of standard scales over large hidden scales. Read More

The status of di-boson and tri-boson production is shortly review. Using the VBFNLO and the LOOPSIM package, approximated results at NNLO QCD are given for WZ production. Results for waa + jet at NLO QCD are also shown. Read More

Extensions of the Standard Model Higgs sector involving weak isotriplet scalars are not only benchmark candidates to reconcile observed anomalies of the recently discovered Higgs-like particle, but also exhibit a vast parameter space, for which the lightest Higgs' phenomenology turns out to be very similar to the Standard Model one. A generic prediction of this model class is the appearance of exotic doubly charged scalar particles. In this paper we adapt existing dilepton+missing energy+jets measurements in the context of SUSY searches to the dominant decay mode $H^{\pm\pm}\to W^\pm W^\pm$ and find that the LHC already starts probing the model's parameter space. Read More

Any new scalar fields that perturbatively solve the hierarchy problem by stabilizing the Higgs mass also generate new contributions to the Higgs field-strength renormalization, irrespective of their gauge representation. These new contributions are physical and their magnitude can be inferred from the requirement of quadratic divergence cancellation, hence they are directly related to the resolution of the hierarchy problem. Upon canonically normalizing the Higgs field these new contributions lead to modifications of Higgs couplings which are typically great enough that the hierarchy problem and the concept of electroweak naturalness can be probed thoroughly within a precision Higgs program. Read More

After the discovery of a Higgs-like particle at the LHC, the determination of its spin quantum numbers across different channels will be the next step in arriving at a more precise understanding of the new state and its role in electroweak symmetry breaking. Event shape observables have been shown to provide extremely sensitive observables for the discrimination of the scalar Higgs boson's CP quantum numbers as a consequence of the different radiation patterns of Higgs production via gluon fusion vs. weak boson fusion in the $pp\to X+2j$ selection. Read More

Many beyond the Standard Model (BSM) scenarios involve Higgs couplings to additional electroweak fields. It is well established that these new fields may modify Higgs gamma-gamma and gamma-Z decays at one-loop. However, one unexplored aspect of such scenarios is that by electroweak symmetry one should also expect modifications to the Higgs Z-Z coupling at one-loop and, more generally, modifications to Higgs production and decay channels beyond tree-level. Read More

ATLAS and CMS have discovered a Standard Model Higgs-like particle. One of the main discovery channels is the Higgs decay to two photons, which, at the moment, seems to be considerably enhanced over the Standard Model expectation. Models with additional charged matter coupling to the Higgs sector can enhance or decrease the Higgs to two photons branching ratio. Read More

Having discovered a candidate for the final piece of the Standard Model, the Higgs boson, the question remains why its vacuum expectation value and its mass are so much smaller than the Planck scale (or any other high scale of new physics). One elegant solution was provided by Coleman and Weinberg, where all mass scales are generated from dimensionless coupling constants via dimensional transmutation. However, the original Coleman-Weinberg scenario predicts a Higgs mass which is too light; it is parametrically suppressed compared to the mass of the vectors bosons, and hence is much lighter than the observed value. Read More

Recently, the ATLAS and CMS experiments have reported the discovery of a Higgs like resonance at the LHC. The next analysis step will include the determination of its spin and CP quantum numbers or the form of its interaction Lagrangian channel-by-channel. We show how weak-boson-fusion Higgs production and associated ZH production can be used to separate different spin and CP states. Read More

After the recent discovery of a Standard Model Higgs boson-like particle at the LHC, the question of its couplings to known and unknown matter is eminent. In this letter, we present a method that allows for an enhancement in S/B(irreducible) of the order of 100% in $pp\to (h\to \gamma\gamma) jj$ for a center of mass energy of 8 and 14 TeV. This is achieved by applying the matrix element method. Read More