# A. Banfi - DESY, University Antwerp

## Contact Details

NameA. Banfi |
||

AffiliationDESY, University Antwerp |
||

CityAntwerp |
||

CountryBelgium |
||

## Pubs By Year |
||

## External Links |
||

## Pub CategoriesHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (48) High Energy Physics - Experiment (15) High Energy Physics - Theory (1) |

## Publications Authored By A. Banfi

**Authors:**D. de Florian

^{1}, C. Grojean

^{2}, F. Maltoni

^{3}, C. Mariotti

^{4}, A. Nikitenko

^{5}, M. Pieri

^{6}, P. Savard

^{7}, M. Schumacher

^{8}, R. Tanaka

^{9}, R. Aggleton

^{10}, M. Ahmad

^{11}, B. Allanach

^{12}, C. Anastasiou

^{13}, W. Astill

^{14}, S. Badger

^{15}, M. Badziak

^{16}, J. Baglio

^{17}, E. Bagnaschi

^{18}, A. Ballestrero

^{19}, A. Banfi

^{20}, D. Barducci

^{21}, M. Beckingham

^{22}, C. Becot

^{23}, G. Bélanger

^{24}, J. Bellm

^{25}, N. Belyaev

^{26}, F. U. Bernlochner

^{27}, C. Beskidt

^{28}, A. Biekötter

^{29}, F. Bishara

^{30}, W. Bizon

^{31}, N. E. Bomark

^{32}, M. Bonvini

^{33}, S. Borowka

^{34}, V. Bortolotto

^{35}, S. Boselli

^{36}, F. J. Botella

^{37}, R. Boughezal

^{38}, G. C. Branco

^{39}, J. Brehmer

^{40}, L. Brenner

^{41}, S. Bressler

^{42}, I. Brivio

^{43}, A. Broggio

^{44}, H. Brun

^{45}, G. Buchalla

^{46}, C. D. Burgard

^{47}, A. Calandri

^{48}, L. Caminada

^{49}, R. Caminal Armadans

^{50}, F. Campanario

^{51}, J. Campbell

^{52}, F. Caola

^{53}, C. M. Carloni Calame

^{54}, S. Carrazza

^{55}, A. Carvalho

^{56}, M. Casolino

^{57}, O. Cata

^{58}, A. Celis

^{59}, F. Cerutti

^{60}, N. Chanon

^{61}, M. Chen

^{62}, X. Chen

^{63}, B. Chokoufé Nejad

^{64}, N. Christensen

^{65}, M. Ciuchini

^{66}, R. Contino

^{67}, T. Corbett

^{68}, D. Curtin

^{69}, M. Dall'Osso

^{70}, A. David

^{71}, S. Dawson

^{72}, J. de Blas

^{73}, W. de Boer

^{74}, P. de Castro Manzano

^{75}, C. Degrande

^{76}, R. L. Delgado

^{77}, F. Demartin

^{78}, A. Denner

^{79}, B. Di Micco

^{80}, R. Di Nardo

^{81}, S. Dittmaier

^{82}, A. Dobado

^{83}, T. Dorigo

^{84}, F. A. Dreyer

^{85}, M. Dührssen

^{86}, C. Duhr

^{87}, F. Dulat

^{88}, K. Ecker

^{89}, K. Ellis

^{90}, U. Ellwanger

^{91}, C. Englert

^{92}, D. Espriu

^{93}, A. Falkowski

^{94}, L. Fayard

^{95}, R. Feger

^{96}, G. Ferrera

^{97}, A. Ferroglia

^{98}, N. Fidanza

^{99}, T. Figy

^{100}, M. Flechl

^{101}, D. Fontes

^{102}, S. Forte

^{103}, P. Francavilla

^{104}, E. Franco

^{105}, R. Frederix

^{106}, A. Freitas

^{107}, F. F. Freitas

^{108}, F. Frensch

^{109}, S. Frixione

^{110}, B. Fuks

^{111}, E. Furlan

^{112}, S. Gadatsch

^{113}, J. Gao

^{114}, Y. Gao

^{115}, M. V. Garzelli

^{116}, T. Gehrmann

^{117}, R. Gerosa

^{118}, M. Ghezzi

^{119}, D. Ghosh

^{120}, S. Gieseke

^{121}, D. Gillberg

^{122}, G. F. Giudice

^{123}, E. W. N. Glover

^{124}, F. Goertz

^{125}, D. Gonçalves

^{126}, J. Gonzalez-Fraile

^{127}, M. Gorbahn

^{128}, S. Gori

^{129}, C. A. Gottardo

^{130}, M. Gouzevitch

^{131}, P. Govoni

^{132}, D. Gray

^{133}, M. Grazzini

^{134}, N. Greiner

^{135}, A. Greljo

^{136}, J. Grigo

^{137}, A. V. Gritsan

^{138}, R. Gröber

^{139}, S. Guindon

^{140}, H. E. Haber

^{141}, C. Han

^{142}, T. Han

^{143}, R. Harlander

^{144}, M. A. Harrendorf

^{145}, H. B. Hartanto

^{146}, C. Hays

^{147}, S. Heinemeyer

^{148}, G. Heinrich

^{149}, M. Herrero

^{150}, F. Herzog

^{151}, B. Hespel

^{152}, V. Hirschi

^{153}, S. Hoeche

^{154}, S. Honeywell

^{155}, S. J. Huber

^{156}, C. Hugonie

^{157}, J. Huston

^{158}, A. Ilnicka

^{159}, G. Isidori

^{160}, B. Jäger

^{161}, M. Jaquier

^{162}, S. P. Jones

^{163}, A. Juste

^{164}, S. Kallweit

^{165}, A. Kaluza

^{166}, A. Kardos

^{167}, A. Karlberg

^{168}, Z. Kassabov

^{169}, N. Kauer

^{170}, D. I. Kazakov

^{171}, M. Kerner

^{172}, W. Kilian

^{173}, F. Kling

^{174}, K. Köneke

^{175}, R. Kogler

^{176}, R. Konoplich

^{177}, S. Kortner

^{178}, S. Kraml

^{179}, C. Krause

^{180}, F. Krauss

^{181}, M. Krawczyk

^{182}, A. Kulesza

^{183}, S. Kuttimalai

^{184}, R. Lane

^{185}, A. Lazopoulos

^{186}, G. Lee

^{187}, P. Lenzi

^{188}, I. M. Lewis

^{189}, Y. Li

^{190}, S. Liebler

^{191}, J. Lindert

^{192}, X. Liu

^{193}, Z. Liu

^{194}, F. J. Llanes-Estrada

^{195}, H. E. Logan

^{196}, D. Lopez-Val

^{197}, I. Low

^{198}, G. Luisoni

^{199}, P. Maierhöfer

^{200}, E. Maina

^{201}, B. Mansoulié

^{202}, H. Mantler

^{203}, M. Mantoani

^{204}, A. C. Marini

^{205}, V. I. Martinez Outschoorn

^{206}, S. Marzani

^{207}, D. Marzocca

^{208}, A. Massironi

^{209}, K. Mawatari

^{210}, J. Mazzitelli

^{211}, A. McCarn

^{212}, B. Mellado

^{213}, K. Melnikov

^{214}, S. B. Menari

^{215}, L. Merlo

^{216}, C. Meyer

^{217}, P. Milenovic

^{218}, K. Mimasu

^{219}, S. Mishima

^{220}, B. Mistlberger

^{221}, S. -O. Moch

^{222}, A. Mohammadi

^{223}, P. F. Monni

^{224}, G. Montagna

^{225}, M. Moreno Llácer

^{226}, N. Moretti

^{227}, S. Moretti

^{228}, L. Motyka

^{229}, A. Mück

^{230}, M. Mühlleitner

^{231}, S. Munir

^{232}, P. Musella

^{233}, P. Nadolsky

^{234}, D. Napoletano

^{235}, M. Nebot

^{236}, C. Neu

^{237}, M. Neubert

^{238}, R. Nevzorov

^{239}, O. Nicrosini

^{240}, J. Nielsen

^{241}, K. Nikolopoulos

^{242}, J. M. No

^{243}, C. O'Brien

^{244}, T. Ohl

^{245}, C. Oleari

^{246}, T. Orimoto

^{247}, D. Pagani

^{248}, C. E. Pandini

^{249}, A. Papaefstathiou

^{250}, A. S. Papanastasiou

^{251}, G. Passarino

^{252}, B. D. Pecjak

^{253}, M. Pelliccioni

^{254}, G. Perez

^{255}, L. Perrozzi

^{256}, F. Petriello

^{257}, G. Petrucciani

^{258}, E. Pianori

^{259}, F. Piccinini

^{260}, M. Pierini

^{261}, A. Pilkington

^{262}, S. Plätzer

^{263}, T. Plehn

^{264}, R. Podskubka

^{265}, C. T. Potter

^{266}, S. Pozzorini

^{267}, K. Prokofiev

^{268}, A. Pukhov

^{269}, I. Puljak

^{270}, M. Queitsch-Maitland

^{271}, J. Quevillon

^{272}, D. Rathlev

^{273}, M. Rauch

^{274}, E. Re

^{275}, M. N. Rebelo

^{276}, D. Rebuzzi

^{277}, L. Reina

^{278}, C. Reuschle

^{279}, J. Reuter

^{280}, M. Riembau

^{281}, F. Riva

^{282}, A. Rizzi

^{283}, T. Robens

^{284}, R. Röntsch

^{285}, J. Rojo

^{286}, J. C. Romão

^{287}, N. Rompotis

^{288}, J. Roskes

^{289}, R. Roth

^{290}, G. P. Salam

^{291}, R. Salerno

^{292}, R. Santos

^{293}, V. Sanz

^{294}, J. J. Sanz-Cillero

^{295}, H. Sargsyan

^{296}, U. Sarica

^{297}, P. Schichtel

^{298}, J. Schlenk

^{299}, T. Schmidt

^{300}, C. Schmitt

^{301}, M. Schönherr

^{302}, U. Schubert

^{303}, M. Schulze

^{304}, S. Sekula

^{305}, M. Sekulla

^{306}, E. Shabalina

^{307}, H. S. Shao

^{308}, J. Shelton

^{309}, C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous

^{310}, S. Y. Shim

^{311}, F. Siegert

^{312}, A. Signer

^{313}, J. P. Silva

^{314}, L. Silvestrini

^{315}, M. Sjodahl

^{316}, P. Slavich

^{317}, M. Slawinska

^{318}, L. Soffi

^{319}, M. Spannowsky

^{320}, C. Speckner

^{321}, D. M. Sperka

^{322}, M. Spira

^{323}, O. Stål

^{324}, F. Staub

^{325}, T. Stebel

^{326}, T. Stefaniak

^{327}, M. Steinhauser

^{328}, I. W. Stewart

^{329}, M. J. Strassler

^{330}, J. Streicher

^{331}, D. M. Strom

^{332}, S. Su

^{333}, X. Sun

^{334}, F. J. Tackmann

^{335}, K. Tackmann

^{336}, A. M. Teixeira

^{337}, R. Teixeira de Lima

^{338}, V. Theeuwes

^{339}, R. Thorne

^{340}, D. Tommasini

^{341}, P. Torrielli

^{342}, M. Tosi

^{343}, F. Tramontano

^{344}, Z. Trócsányi

^{345}, M. Trott

^{346}, I. Tsinikos

^{347}, M. Ubiali

^{348}, P. Vanlaer

^{349}, W. Verkerke

^{350}, A. Vicini

^{351}, L. Viliani

^{352}, E. Vryonidou

^{353}, D. Wackeroth

^{354}, C. E. M. Wagner

^{355}, J. Wang

^{356}, S. Wayand

^{357}, G. Weiglein

^{358}, C. Weiss

^{359}, M. Wiesemann

^{360}, C. Williams

^{361}, J. Winter

^{362}, D. Winterbottom

^{363}, R. Wolf

^{364}, M. Xiao

^{365}, L. L. Yang

^{366}, R. Yohay

^{367}, S. P. Y. Yuen

^{368}, G. Zanderighi

^{369}, M. Zaro

^{370}, D. Zeppenfeld

^{371}, R. Ziegler

^{372}, T. Zirke

^{373}, J. Zupan

^{374}

**Affiliations:**

^{1}eds.,

^{2}eds.,

^{3}eds.,

^{4}eds.,

^{5}eds.,

^{6}eds.,

^{7}eds.,

^{8}eds.,

^{9}eds.,

^{10}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{11}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{12}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{13}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{14}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{15}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{16}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{17}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{18}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{19}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{20}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{21}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{22}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{23}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{24}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{25}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{26}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{27}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{28}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{29}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{30}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{31}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{32}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{33}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{34}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{35}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{36}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{37}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{38}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{39}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{40}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{41}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{42}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{43}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{44}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{45}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{46}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{47}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{48}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{49}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{50}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{51}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{52}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{53}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{54}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{55}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{56}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{57}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{58}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{59}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{60}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{61}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{62}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{63}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{64}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{65}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{66}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{67}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{68}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{69}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{70}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{71}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{72}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{73}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{74}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{75}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{76}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{77}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{78}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{79}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{80}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{81}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{82}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{83}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{84}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{85}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{86}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{87}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{88}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{89}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{90}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{91}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{92}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{93}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{94}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{95}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{96}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{97}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{98}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{99}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{100}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{101}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{102}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{103}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{104}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{105}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{106}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{107}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{108}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{109}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{110}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{111}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{112}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{113}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{114}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{115}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{116}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{117}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{118}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{119}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{120}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{121}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{122}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{123}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{124}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{125}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{126}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{127}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{128}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{129}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{130}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{131}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{132}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{133}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{134}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{135}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{136}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{137}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{138}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{139}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{140}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{141}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{142}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{143}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{144}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{145}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{146}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{147}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{148}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{149}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{150}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{151}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{152}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{153}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{154}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{155}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{156}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{157}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{158}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{159}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{160}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{161}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{162}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{163}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{164}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{165}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{166}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{167}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{168}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{169}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{170}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{171}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{172}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{173}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{174}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{175}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{176}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{177}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{178}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{179}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{180}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{181}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{182}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{183}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{184}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{185}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{186}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{187}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{188}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{189}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{190}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{191}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{192}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{193}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{194}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{195}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{196}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{197}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{198}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{199}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{200}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{201}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{202}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{203}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{204}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{205}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{206}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{207}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{208}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{209}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{210}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{211}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{212}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{213}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{214}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{215}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{216}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{217}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{218}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{219}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{220}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{221}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{222}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{223}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{224}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{225}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{226}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{227}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{228}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{229}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{230}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{231}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{232}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{233}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{234}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{235}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{236}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{237}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{238}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{239}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{240}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{241}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{242}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{243}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{244}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{245}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{246}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{247}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{248}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{249}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{250}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{251}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{252}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{253}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{254}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{255}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{256}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{257}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{258}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{259}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{260}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{261}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{262}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{263}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{264}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{265}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{266}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{267}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{268}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{269}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{270}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{271}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{272}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{273}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{274}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{275}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{276}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{277}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{278}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{279}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{280}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{281}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{282}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{283}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{284}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{285}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{286}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{287}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{288}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{289}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{290}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{291}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{292}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{293}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{294}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{295}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{296}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{297}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{298}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{299}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{300}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{301}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{302}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{303}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{304}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{305}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{306}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{307}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{308}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{309}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{310}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{311}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{312}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{313}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{314}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{315}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{316}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{317}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{318}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{319}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{320}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{321}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{322}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{323}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{324}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{325}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{326}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{327}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{328}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{329}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{330}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{331}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{332}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{333}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{334}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{335}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{336}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{337}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{338}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{339}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{340}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{341}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{342}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{343}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{344}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{345}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{346}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{347}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{348}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{349}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{350}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{351}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{352}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{353}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{354}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{355}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{356}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{357}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{358}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{359}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{360}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{361}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{362}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{363}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{364}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{365}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{366}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{367}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{368}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{369}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{370}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{371}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{372}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{373}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,

^{374}The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group

This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay branching ratios, parton distribution functions, and off-shell Higgs boson production and interference effects. Read More

We present the first next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummation for the two-jet rate in $e^+e^-$ annihilation in the Durham and Cambridge algorithms. The results are obtained by extending the ARES method to observables involving any global, recursively infrared and collinear safe jet algorithm in e^+e^- collisions. As opposed to other methods, this approach does not require a factorization theorem for the observables. Read More

**Authors:**David d'Enterria

^{1}, Peter Z. Skands

^{2}, S. Alekhin, A. Banfi, S. Bethke, J. Blümlein, K. G. Chetyrkin, D. d'Enterria, G. Dissertori, X. Garcia i Tormo, A. H. Hoang, M. Klasen, T. Klijnsma, S. Kluth, J. -L. Kneur, B. A. Kniehl, D. W. Kolodrubetz, J. Kühn, P. Mackenzie, B. Malaescu, V. Mateu, L. Mihaila, S. Moch, K. Mönig, R. Perez-Ramos, A. Pich, J. Pires, K. Rabbertz, G. P. Salam, F. Sannino, J. Soto i Riera, M. Srebre, I. W. Stewart

**Affiliations:**

^{1}eds.,

^{2}eds.

This document provides a writeup of all contributions to the workshop on "High precision measurements of $\alpha_s$: From LHC to FCC-ee" held at CERN, Oct. 12--13, 2015. The workshop explored in depth the latest developments on the determination of the QCD coupling $\alpha_s$ from 15 methods where high precision measurements are (or will be) available. Read More

We present new results for the jet-veto efficiency and zero-jet cross section in Higgs production through gluon fusion. We incorporate the N$^3$LO corrections to the total cross section, the NNLO corrections to the 1-jet rate, NNLL resummation for the jet $p_t$ and LL resummation for the jet radius dependence. Our results include known finite-mass corrections and are obtained using the jet-veto efficiency method, updated relative to earlier work to take into account what has been learnt from the new precision calculations that we include. Read More

We present a novel method for resummation of event shapes to next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic (NNLL) accuracy. We discuss the technique and describe its implementation in a numerical program in the case of e^+e^- collisions where the resummed prediction is matched to NNLO. We reproduce all the existing predictions and present new results for oblateness and thrust major. Read More

Fermionic top-partners arise in models such as Composite Higgs and Little Higgs. They modify Higgs properties, in particular how the Higgs couples to top quarks. Alas, there is a low-energy cancellation acting in the coupling of the Higgs boson to gluons and photons. Read More

We study the impact of finite mass effects due to top and bottom loops in the jet-veto distribution for Higgs production. We discuss the appearance of non-factorizing logarithms in the region pt > m_b. We study their numerical impact and argue that these terms can be treated as a finite remainder. Read More

**Authors:**The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, S. Heinemeyer

^{1}, C. Mariotti

^{2}, G. Passarino

^{3}, R. Tanaka

^{4}, J. R. Andersen, P. Artoisenet, E. A. Bagnaschi, A. Banfi, T. Becher, F. U. Bernlochner, S. Bolognesi, P. Bolzoni, R. Boughezal, D. Buarque, J. Campbell, F. Caola, M. Carena, F. Cascioli, N. Chanon, T. Cheng, S. Y. Choi, A. David, P. de Aquino, G. Degrassi, D. Del Re, A. Denner, H. van Deurzen, S. Diglio, B. Di Micco, R. Di Nardo, S. Dittmaier, M. Duhrssen, R. K. Ellis, G. Ferrera, N. Fidanza, M. Flechl, D. de Florian, S. Forte, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, S. Gangal, Y. Gao, M. V. Garzelli, D. Gillberg, P. Govoni, M. Grazzini, N. Greiner, J. Griffiths, A . V. Gritsan, C. Grojean, D. C. Hall, C. Hays, R. Harlander, R. Hernandez-Pinto, S. Hoche, J. Huston, T. Jubb, M. Kadastik, S. Kallweit, A. Kardos, L. Kashif, N. Kauer, H. Kim, R. Klees, M. Kramer, F. Krauss, A. Laureys, S. Laurila, S. Lehti, Q. Li, S. Liebler, X. Liu, H. E. Logan, G. Luisoni, M. Malberti, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, F. Maierhofer, H. Mantler, S. Martin, P. Mastrolia, O. Mattelaer, J. Mazzitelli, B. Mellado, K. Melnikov, P. Meridiani, D. J. Miller, E. Mirabella, S. O. Moch, P. Monni, N. Moretti, A. Muck, M. Muhlleitner, P. Musella, P. Nason, C. Neu, M. Neubert, C. Oleari, J. Olsen, G. Ossola, T. Peraro, K. Peters, F. Petriello, G. Piacquadio, C. T. Potter, S. Pozzorini, K. Prokofiev, I. Puljak, M. Rauch, D. Rebuzzi, L. Reina, R. Rietkerk, A. Rizzi, Y. Rotstein-Habarnau, G. P. Salam, G. Sborlini, F. Schissler, M. Schonherr, M. Schulze, M. Schumacher, F. Siegert, P. Slavich, J. M. Smillie, O. Stal, J. F. von Soden-Fraunhofen, M. Spira, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, P. T. E. Taylor, D. Tommasini, J. Thompson, R. S. Thorne, P. Torrielli, F. Tramontano, N. V. Tran, Z. Trocsanyi, M. Ubiali, P. Vanlaer, M. Vazquez Acosta, T. Vickey, A. Vicini, W. J. Waalewijn, D. Wackeroth, C. Wagner, J. R. Walsh, J. Wang, G. Weiglein, A. Whitbeck, C. Williams, J. Yu, G. Zanderighi, M. Zanetti, M. Zaro, P. M. Zerwas, C. Zhang, T. J . E. Zirke, S. Zuberi

**Affiliations:**

^{1}eds.,

^{2}eds.,

^{3}eds.,

^{4}eds.

This Report summarizes the results of the activities in 2012 and the first half of 2013 of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group. The main goal of the working group was to present the state of the art of Higgs Physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. This report follows the first working group report Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Read More

We present a next-to-leading logarithmic resummation for the jet-veto efficiency in Higgs production. We then discuss how this prediction affects the theoretical uncertainties in the region of transverse momenta of interest for Higgs searches at the LHC. Read More

We discuss the effect of next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD corrections to the Higgsstrahlung process, where the Higgs boson decays to bottom quarks, using a partonic-level fully differential code. First we evaluate the impact of initial- and final-state gluon radiation on the reconstruction of a mass peak with the fat-jet analysis in the boosted regime at the LHC with sqrt(s) = 14 TeV as proposed in Butterworth et al. (2008) [1]. Read More

We derive first next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummations for jet-veto efficiencies in Higgs and Z-boson production at hadron colliders. Matching with next-to-next-to-leading order results allows us to provide a range of phenomenological predictions for the LHC, including cross-section results, detailed uncertainty estimates and comparisons to current widely-used tools. Read More

We make theoretical predictions for the recently introduced variable \phi* corresponding to the azimuthal angle between leptons produced in the Drell-Yan process at the LHC. As a consequence of this work we are also able to generate results for the more commonly studied transverse momentum Q_T of the lepton pair. Comparisons of these purely perturbative estimates for the Q_T case yield good agreement with ATLAS and CMS data, as we demonstrate. Read More

Using the technology of the CAESAR approach to resummation, we examine the jet-veto efficiency in Higgs-boson and Drell-Yan production at hadron colliders and show that at next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) accuracy the resummation reduces to just a Sudakov form factor. Matching with NNLO calculations results in stable predictions for the case of Drell-Yan production, but reveals substantial uncertainties in gluon-fusion Higgs production, connected in part with the poor behaviour of the perturbative series for the total cross section. We compare our results to those from POWHEG with and without reweighting by HqT, as used experimentally, and observe acceptable agreement. Read More

The astounding Physics results obtained with high-energy colliders in the last two decades owe much to an impressive progress in the understanding of the dynamics of strong interactions. I give here a personal overview of how the advance in QCD triggered by the Physics of hadronic final states at LEP has been exploited for New Physics searches at the LHC. Conversely, the need for precision calculations for LHC experiments has stimulated a huge progress in the understanding of the all-order structure of gauge theories. Read More

**Authors:**LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, S. Dittmaier

^{1}, C. Mariotti

^{2}, G. Passarino

^{3}, R. Tanaka

^{4}, S. Alekhin, J. Alwall, E. A. Bagnaschi, A. Banfi, J. Blumlein, S. Bolognesi, N. Chanon, T. Cheng, L. Cieri, A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, M. Cutajar, S. Dawson, G. Davies, N. De Filippis, G. Degrassi, A. Denner, D. D'Enterria, S. Diglio, B. Di Micco, R. Di Nardo, R. K. Ellis, A. Farilla, S. Farrington, M. Felcini, G. Ferrera, M. Flechl, D. de Florian, S. Forte, S. Ganjour, M. V. Garzelli, S. Gascon-Shotkin, S. Glazov, S. Goria, M. Grazzini, J. -Ph. Guillet, C. Hackstein, K. Hamilton, R. Harlander, M. Hauru, S. Heinemeyer, S. Hoche, J. Huston, C. Jackson, P. Jimenez-Delgado, M. D. Jorgensen, M. Kado, S. Kallweit, A. Kardos, N. Kauer, H. Kim, M. Kovac, M. Kramer, F. Krauss, C. -M. Kuo, S. Lehti, Q. Li, N. Lorenzo, F. Maltoni, B. Mellado, S. O. Moch, A. Muck, M. Muhlleitner, P. Nadolsky, P. Nason, C. Neu, A. Nikitenko, C. Oleari, J. Olsen, S. Palmer, S. Paganis, C. G. Papadopoulos, T . C. Petersen, F. Petriello, F. Petrucci, G. Piacquadio, E. Pilon, C. T. Potter, J. Price, I. Puljak, W. Quayle, V. Radescu, D. Rebuzzi, L. Reina, J. Rojo, D. Rosco, G. P. Salam, A. Sapronov, J. Schaarschmidt, M. Schonherr, M. Schumacher, F. Siegert, P. Slavich, M. Spira, I. W. Stewart, W. J. Stirling, F. Stockli, C. Sturm, F. J. Tackmann, R. S. Thorne, D. Tommasini, P. Torrielli, F. Tramontano, Z. Trocsanyi, M. Ubiali, S. Uccirati, M. Vazquez Acosta, T. Vickey, A. Vicini, W. J. Waalewijn, D. Wackeroth, M. Warsinsky, M. Weber, M. Wiesemann, G. Weiglein, J. Yu, G. Zanderighi

**Affiliations:**

^{1}eds.,

^{2}eds.,

^{3}eds.,

^{4}eds.

This Report summarises the results of the second year's activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group. The main goal of the working group was to present the state of the art of Higgs Physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first working group report Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Read More

The measurement of the low transverse momentum region of vector boson production in Drell-Yan processes has long been invaluable to testing our knowledge of QCD dynamics both beyond fixed-order in perturbation theory as well as in the non-perturbative region. Recently the D\O\ collaboration have introduced novel variables which lead to improved measurements compared to the case of the standard QT variable. To complement this improvement on the experimental side, we develop here a complete phenomenological study dedicated in particular to the new \phi* variable. Read More

We report on the computation of the angle-between-leptons distribution in Drell-Yan processes. More precisely we study the recently introduced variable phi*, which provides us with a more accurate probe of the low Q_T domain of Z boson production at hadron colliders. Our theoretical prediction is obtained by matching a next-to-next-to leading logarithmic (NNLL) resummation to a fixed order calculation at next-to-leading order (NLO). Read More

The D0 collaboration has recently introduced new variables, a_T and phi* to more accurately probe the low Q_T domain of Z boson production at hadron colliders than had been previously possible through a direct study of the Q_T distribution. The comparison of such accurate data to precise theoretical predictions from QCD perturbation theory will yield important information on the ability of resummed QCD predictions as well as parton shower models to describe the low Q_T domain and should enable more stringent constraints on non-perturbative effects. In the present paper we provide analytical predictions for the above mentioned variables, that contain resummation of large logarithms, including next-to-next-to leading logarithmic (NNLL) terms, supplemented by exact next-to-leading order calculations from MCFM. Read More

N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory exhibits a rather surprising duality of Wilson-loop vacuum expectation values and scattering amplitudes. In this paper, we investigate this correspondence at the diagram level. We find that one-loop triangles, one-loop boxes, and two-loop diagonal boxes can be cast as simple one- and two- parametric integrals over a single propagator in configuration space. Read More

We present precision results for distributions in global event shapes that can be measured at hadron colliders within experimental limitations. These predictions are obtained by combining exact next-to-leading order (NLO) with the all-order resummation of large logarithms of soft and collinear origin. We then discuss how event-shape measurements can be used for the tuning of Monte Carlo event generators, for tests of models of hadronisation and underlying event, and as discriminatory tools between QCD jet-like and New Physics events. Read More

In future measurements of the dilepton ($Z/\gamma^*$) transverse momentum, \Qt, at both the Tevatron and LHC, the achievable bin widths and the ultimate precision of the measurements will be limited by experimental resolution rather than by the available event statistics. In a recent paper the variable \at, which corresponds to the component of \Qt\ that is transverse to the dilepton thrust axis, has been studied in this regard. In the region, \Qt\ $<$ 30 GeV, \at\ has been shown to be less susceptible to experimental resolution and efficiency effects than the \Qt. Read More

We consider jet-shape observables of the type proposed recently, where the shapes of one or more high-pT jets, produced in a multi-jet event with definite jet multiplicity, may be measured leaving other jets in the event unmeasured. We point out the structure of the full next-to-leading logarithmic resummation specifically including resummation of non-global logarithms in the leading-Nc limit and emphasising their properties. We also point out differences between jet algorithms in the context of soft gluon resummation for such observables. Read More

We present results for matched distributions of a range of dijet event shapes at hadron colliders, combining next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) accuracy in the resummation exponent, next-to-next-to leading logarithmic (NNLL) accuracy in its expansion and next-to-leading order (NLO) accuracy in a pure alpha_s expansion. This is the first time that such a matching has been carried out for hadronic final-state observables at hadron colliders. We compare our results to Monte Carlo predictions, with and without matching to multi-parton tree-level fixed-order calculations. Read More

We provide the first theoretical study of a novel variable, $a_T$, proposed in Ref.[1] as a more accurate probe of the region of low transverse momentum $p_T$, for the $Z$ boson $p_T$ distribution at hadron colliders. The $a_T$ is the component of $p_T$ transverse to a suitably defined axis. Read More

We report on the status of the QCD analysis of dijet azimuthal decorrelations. We emphasise the relevance of resummation of soft and collinear enhancements in describing these observables in the region where the two jets are nearly back-to-back in the transverse plane. We also discuss the sources of theoretical uncertainties and possible research directions aimed at their reduction. Read More

We provide a theoretical study of a novel variable introduced in Ref. \cite{WV} to study the transverse momentum of the Z boson at hadron colliders. The variable we consider has experimental advantages over the standard $p_T$ distribution enabling more accurate measurement at low $p_T$. Read More

**Authors:**H. Jung

^{1}, A. De Roeck

^{2}, Z. J. Ajaltouni

^{3}, S. Albino

^{4}, G. Altarelli

^{5}, F. Ambroglini

^{6}, J. Anderson

^{7}, G. Antchev

^{8}, M. Arneodo

^{9}, P. Aspell

^{10}, V. Avati

^{11}, M. Bahr

^{12}, A. Bacchetta

^{13}, M. G. Bagliesi

^{14}, R. D. Ball

^{15}, A. Banfi

^{16}, S. Baranov

^{17}, P. Bartalini

^{18}, J. Bartels

^{19}, F. Bechtel

^{20}, V. Berardi

^{21}, M. Berretti

^{22}, G. Beuf

^{23}, M. Biasini

^{24}, I. Bierenbaum

^{25}, J. Blumlein

^{26}, R. E. Blair

^{27}, C. Bombonati

^{28}, M. Boonekamp

^{29}, U. Bottigli

^{30}, S. Boutle

^{31}, M. Bozzo

^{32}, E. Brucken

^{33}, J. Bracinik

^{34}, A. Bruni

^{35}, G. E. Bruno

^{36}, A. Buckley

^{37}, A. Bunyatyan

^{38}, H. Burkhardt

^{39}, P. Bussey

^{40}, A. Buzzo

^{41}, M. Cacciari

^{42}, F. Cafagna

^{43}, M. Calicchio

^{44}, F. Caola

^{45}, M. G. Catanesi

^{46}, P. L. Catastini

^{47}, R. Cecchi

^{48}, F. A. Ceccopieri

^{49}, S. Cerci

^{50}, S. Chekanov

^{51}, R. Chierici

^{52}, M. Ciafaloni

^{53}, M. A. Ciocci

^{54}, V. Coco

^{55}, D. Colferai

^{56}, A. Cooper-Sarkar

^{57}, G. Corcella

^{58}, M. Czakon

^{59}, A. Dainese

^{60}, M. Dasgupta

^{61}, M. Deak

^{62}, M. Deile

^{63}, P. A. Delsart

^{64}, L. Del Debbio

^{65}, A. de Roeck

^{66}, C. Diaconu

^{67}, M. Diehl

^{68}, E. Dimovasili

^{69}, M. Dittmar

^{70}, I. M. Dremin

^{71}, K. Eggert

^{72}, R. Engel

^{73}, V. Eremin

^{74}, S. Erhan

^{75}, C. Ewerz

^{76}, L. Fano

^{77}, J. Feltesse

^{78}, G. Ferrera

^{79}, F. Ferro

^{80}, R. Field

^{81}, S. Forte

^{82}, F. Garcia

^{83}, A. Geiser

^{84}, F. Gelis

^{85}, S. Giani

^{86}, S. Gieseke

^{87}, M. A. Gigg

^{88}, A. Glazov

^{89}, K. Golec-Biernat

^{90}, K. Goulianos

^{91}, J. Grebenyuk

^{92}, V. Greco

^{93}, D. Grellscheid

^{94}, G. Grindhammer

^{95}, M. Grothe

^{96}, A. Guffanti

^{97}, C. Gwenlan

^{98}, V. Halyo

^{99}, K. Hamilton

^{100}, F. Hautmann

^{101}, J. Heino

^{102}, G. Heinrich

^{103}, T. Hilden

^{104}, K. Hiller

^{105}, J. Hollar

^{106}, X. Janssen

^{107}, S. Joseph

^{108}, A. W. Jung

^{109}, H. Jung

^{110}, V. Juranek, J. Kaspar, O. Kepka, V. A. Khoze, Ch. Kiesling, M. Klasen, S. Klein, B. A. Kniehl, A. Knutsson, J. Kopal, G. Kramer, F. Krauss, V. Kundrat, K. Kurvinen, K. Kutak, L. Lonnblad, S. Lami, G. Latino, J. I. Latorre, O. Latunde-Dada, R. Lauhakangas, V. Lendermann, P. Lenzi, G. Li, A. Likhoded, A. Lipatov, E. Lippmaa, M. Lokajicek, M. Lo Vetere, F. Lucas Rodriguez, G. Luisoni, E. Lytken, K. Muller, M. Macri, G. Magazzu, A. Majhi, S. Majhi, P. Marage, L. Marti, A. D. Martin, M. Meucci, D. A. Milstead, S. Minutoli, A. Nischke, A. Moares, S. Moch, L. Motyka, T. Namsoo, P. Newman, H. Niewiadomski, C. Nockles, E. Noschis, G. Notarnicola, J. Nystrand, E. Oliveri, F. Oljemark, K. Osterberg, R. Orava, M. Oriunno, S. Osman, S. Ostapchenko, P. Palazzi, E. Pedreschi, A. V. Pereira, H. Perrey, J. Petajajarvi, T. Petersen, A. Piccione, T. Pierog, J. L. Pinfold, O. I. Piskounova, S. Platzer, M. Quinto, Z. Rurikova, E. Radermacher, V. Radescu, E. Radicioni, F. Ravotti, G. Rella, P. Richardson, E. Robutti, G. Rodrigo, E. Rodrigues, M. Rogal, T. C. Rogers, J. Rojo, P. Roloff, L. Ropelewski, C. Rosemann, Ch. Royon, G. Ruggiero, A. Rummel, M. Ruspa, M. G. Ryskin, D. Salek, W. Slominski, H. Saarikko, A. Sabio Vera, T. Sako, G. P. Salam, V. A. Saleev, C. Sander, G. Sanguinetti, A. Santroni, Th. Schorner-Sadenius, R. Schicker, I. Schienbein, W. B. Schmidke, F. Schwennsen, A. Scribano, G. Sette, M. H. Seymour, A. Sherstnev, T. Sjostrand, W. Snoeys, G. Somogyi, L. Sonnenschein, G. Soyez, H. Spiesberger, F. Spinella, P. Squillacioti, A. M. Stasto, A. Starodumov, H. Stenzel, Ph. Stephens, A. Ster, D. Stocco, M. Strikman, C. Taylor, T. Teubner, R. S. Thorne, Z. Trocsanyi, M. Treccani, D. Treleani, L. Trentadue, A. Trummal, J. Tully, W. K. Tung, M. Turcato, N. Turini, M. Ubiali, A. Valkarova, A. van Hameren, P. Van Mechelen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, B. F. L. Ward, G. Watt, B. R. Webber, Ch. Weiss, Ch. White, J. Whitmore, R. Wolf, J. Wu, A. Yagues-Molina, S. A. Yost, G. Zanderighi, N. Zotov, M. zur Nedden

**Affiliations:**

^{1}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{2}CERN, U. Antwerp,

^{3}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{4}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{5}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{6}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{7}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{8}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{9}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{10}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{11}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{12}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{13}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{14}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{15}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{16}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{17}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{18}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{19}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{20}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{21}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{22}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{23}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{24}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{25}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{26}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{27}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{28}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{29}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{30}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{31}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{32}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{33}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{34}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{35}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{36}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{37}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{38}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{39}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{40}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{41}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{42}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{43}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{44}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{45}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{46}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{47}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{48}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{49}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{50}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{51}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{52}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{53}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{54}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{55}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{56}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{57}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{58}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{59}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{60}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{61}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{62}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{63}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{64}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{65}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{66}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{67}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{68}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{69}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{70}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{71}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{72}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{73}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{74}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{75}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{76}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{77}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{78}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{79}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{80}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{81}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{82}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{83}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{84}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{85}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{86}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{87}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{88}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{89}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{90}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{91}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{92}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{93}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{94}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{95}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{96}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{97}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{98}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{99}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{100}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{101}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{102}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{103}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{104}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{105}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{106}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{107}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{108}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{109}DESY, U. Antwerp,

^{110}DESY, U. Antwerp

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

2nd workshop on the implications of HERA for LHC physics. Working groups: Parton Density Functions Multi-jet final states and energy flows Heavy quarks (charm and beauty) Diffraction Cosmic Rays Monte Carlos and Tools Read More

**Authors:**F. Ambroglini, R. Armillis, P. Azzi, G. Bagliesi, A. Ballestrero, G. Balossini, A. Banfi, P. Bartalini, D. Benedetti, G. Bevilacqua, S. Bolognesi, A. Cafarella, C. M. Carloni Calame, L. Carminati, M. Cobal, G. Corcella, C. Coriano', A. Dainese, V. Del Duca, F. Fabbri, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Fano', Alon E. Faraggi, S. Frixione, L. Garbini, A. Giammanco, M. Guzzi, N. Irges, E. Maina, C. Mariotti, G. Masetti, B. Mele, E. Migliore, G. Montagna, M. Monteno, M. Moretti, P. Nason, O. Nicrosini, A. Nisati, A. Perrotta, F. Piccinini, G. Polesello, D. Rebuzzi, A. Rizzi, S. Rolli, C. Roda, S. Rosati, A. Santocchia, D. Stocco, F. Tartarelli, R. Tenchini, A. Tonero, M. Treccani, D. Treleani, A. Tricoli, D. Trocino, L. Vecchi, A. Vicini, I. Vivarelli

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

These proceedings collect the presentations given at the first three meetings of the INFN "Workshop on Monte Carlo's, Physics and Simulations at the LHC", held at the Frascati National Laboratories in 2006. The first part of these proceedings contains pedagogical introductions to several basic topics of both theoretical and experimental high pT LHC physics. The second part collects more specialised presentations. Read More

**Authors:**F. Ambroglini, R. Armillis, P. Azzi, G. Bagliesi, A. Ballestrero, G. Balossini, A. Banfi, P. Bartalini, D. Benedetti, G. Bevilacqua, S. Bolognesi, A. Cafarella, C. M. Carloni Calame, L. Carminati, M. Cobal, G. Corcella, C. Coriano', A. Dainese, V. Del Duca, F. Fabbri, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Fano', Alon E. Faraggi, S. Frixione, L. Garbini, A. Giammanco, M. Grazzini, M. Guzzi, N. Irges, E. Maina, C. Mariotti, G. Masetti, B. Mele, E. Migliore, G. Montagna, M. Monteno, M. Moretti, P. Nason, O. Nicrosini, A. Nisati, A. Perrotta, F. Piccinini, G. Polesello, D. Rebuzzi, A. Rizzi, S. Rolli, C. Roda, S. Rosati, A. Santocchia, D. Stocco, F. Tartarelli, R. Tenchini, A. Tonero, M. Treccani, D. Treleani, A. Tricoli, D. Trocino, L. Vecchi, A. Vicini, I. Vivarelli

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

These proceedings collect the presentations given at the first three meetings of the INFN "Workshop on Monte Carlo's, Physics and Simulations at the LHC", held at the Frascati National Laboratories in 2006. The first part of these proceedings contains pedagogical introductions to several basic topics of both theoretical and experimental high pT LHC physics. The second part collects more specialised presentations. Read More

A quantity that promises to reveal important information on perturbative and non-perturbative QCD dynamics is the azimuthal decorrelation between jets in different hard processes. In order to access this information fixed-order NLO predictions need to be supplemented by resummation of logarithmic terms which are large in the region where the jets are nearly back-to-back in azimuth. In the present letter we carry out this resummation to next-to--leading logarithmic accuracy explaining the important role played by the recombination scheme in general resummations for such jet observables. Read More

Three-jet event-shape distributions can be exploited to investigate the dependence of hadronisation effects on the colour and the geometry of the underlying hard event. We present here the first comparison of data in e+e- annihilation and state-of-the-art theoretical predictions, including resummation of large logarithms at next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy matched to exact next-to-leading order and leading non-perturbative power corrections. Read More

Heavy-quark jets are important in many of today's collider studies and searches, yet predictions for them are subject to much larger uncertainties than for light jets. This is because of strong enhancements in higher orders from large logarithms, ln(p_t/m_Q). We propose a new definition of heavy-quark jets, which is free of final-state logarithms to all orders and such that all initial-state collinear logarithms can be resummed into the heavy-quark parton distributions. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Milan Bicocca U. & INFN, Milan,

^{2}Rome U.,

^{3}Manchester U.

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We study the mismatch between a full calculation of non-global single-logarithms in the large-N_c limit and an approximation based on free azimuthal averaging, and the consequent angular-ordered pattern of soft gluon radiation in QCD. We compare the results obtained in either case to those obtained from the parton showers in the Monte Carlo event generators HERWIG and PYTHIA, with the aim of assessing the accuracy of the parton showers with regard to such observables where angular ordering is merely an approximation even at leading-logarithmic accuracy and which are commonly employed for the tuning of event generators to data. Read More

We revisit the impact of the jet algorithm on predictions of energy flow into gaps between hard jets, defined using the kt clustering procedure. The resulting prediction has two distinct components: a primary emission piece that is related to independent emission of soft gluons by the hard jets and a correlated emission (non-global) piece known only in the large N_c limit. We analytically compute the dependence of the primary emission term on the jet algorithm, which gives significantly more insight than our previous numerical study of the same. Read More

A short overview of recent developments on resummations in QCD is presented. Read More

We review the status of non-perturbative analyses of multi-jet event shape distributions and mean values, highlighting the physical insight on QCD dynamics they can provide. Read More

It is common, in both theoretical and experimental studies, to separately discuss quark and gluon jets. However, even at parton level, widely-used jet algorithms fail to provide an infrared safe way of making this distinction. We examine the origin of the problem, and propose a solution in terms of a new "flavour-kt" algorithm. Read More

**Authors:**S. Alekhin, G. Altarelli, N. Amapane, J. Andersen, V. Andreev, M. Arneodo, V. Avati, J. Baines, R. D. Ball, A. Banfi, S. P. Baranov, J. Bartels, O. Behnke, R. Bellan, J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher, S. Bolognesi, M. Boonekamp, D. Bourilkov, J. Bracinik, A. Bruni, G. Bruni, A. Buckley, A. Bunyatyan, C. M. Buttar, J. M. Butterworth, S. Butterworth, M. Cacciari, T. Carli, G. Cerminara, S. Chekanov, M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, J. Collins, A. Cooper-Sarkar, G. Corcella, M. Corradi, B. E. Cox, R. Croft, Z. Czyczula, A. Dainese, M. Dasgupta, G. Davatz, L. Del Debbio, Y. Delenda, A. De Roeck, M. Diehl, S. Diglio, G. Dissertori, M. Dittmar, J. Ellis, K. J. Eskola, T. O. Eynck, J. Feltesse, F. Ferro, R. D. Field, J. Forshaw, S. Forte, A. Geiser, S. Gieseke, A. Glazov, T. Gleisberg, P. Golonka, E. Gotsman, G. Grindhammer, M. Grothe, C. Group, M. Groys, A. Guffanti, G. Gustafson, C. Gwenlan, S. Hoche, C. Hogg, J. Huston, G. Iacobucci, G. Ingelman, S. Jadach, H. Jung, J. Kalliopuska, M. Kapishin, B. Kersevan, V. Khoze, M. Klasen, M. Klein, B. A. Kniehl, V. J. Kolhinen, H. Kowalski, G. Kramer, F. Krauss, S. Kretzer, K. Kutak, J. W. Lamsa, L. Lonnblad, T. Lastovicka, G. Lastovicka-Medin, E. Laenen, Th. Lagouri, J. I. Latorre, N. Lavesson, V. Lendermann, E. Levin, A. Levy, A. V. Lipatov, M. Lublinsky, L. Lytkin, T. Maki, L. Magnea, F. Maltoni, M. Mangano, U. Maor, C. Mariotti, N. Marola, A. D. Martin, A. Meyer, S. Moch, J. Monk, A. Moraes, A. Morsch, L. Motyka, E. Naftali, P. Newman, A. Nikitenko, F. Oljemark, R. Orava, M. Ottela, K. Osterberg, K. Peters, F. Petrucci, A. Piccione, A. Pilkington, K. Piotrzkowski, O. I. Piskounova, A. Proskuryakov, A. Prygarin, J. Pumplin, K. Rabbertz, R. Ranieri, V. Ravindran, B. Reisert, E. Richter-Was, L. Rinaldi, P. Robbe, E. Rodrigues, J. Rojo, H. Ruiz, M. Ruspa, M. G. Ryskin, A. Sabio Vera, G. P. Salam, A. Schalicke, S. Schatzel, T. Schorner-Sadenius, I. Schienbein, F-P. Schilling, S. Schumann, M. H. Seymour, F. Siegert, T. Sjostrand, M. Skrzypek, J. Smith, M. Smizanska, H. Spiesberger, F. Schrempp, A. Stasto, H. Stenzel, W. J. Stirling, P. Szczypka, S. Tapprogge, C. Targett-Adams, M. Tasevsky, T. Teubner, R. S. Thorne, A. Tonazzo, A. Tricoli, N. Tuning, J. Turnau, U. Uwer, P. Van Mechelen, R. Venugopalan, M. Verducci, J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, R. Vogt, B. F. L. Ward, Z. Was, G. Watt, B. M. Waugh, C. Weiser, M. R. Whalley, M. Wing, J. Winter, S. A. Yost, G. Zanderighi, N. P. Zotov

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

The HERA electron--proton collider has collected 100 pb$^{-1}$ of data since its start-up in 1992, and recently moved into a high-luminosity operation mode, with upgraded detectors, aiming to increase the total integrated luminosity per experiment to more than 500 pb$^{-1}$. HERA has been a machine of excellence for the study of QCD and the structure of the proton. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which will collide protons with a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV, will be completed at CERN in 2007. Read More

**Authors:**S. Alekhin, G. Altarelli, N. Amapane, J. Andersen, V. Andreev, M. Arneodo, V. Avati, J. Baines, R. D. Ball, A. Banfi, S. P. Baranov, J. Bartels, O. Behnke, R. Bellan, J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher, S. Bolognesi, M. Boonekamp, D. Bourilkov, J. Bracinik, A. Bruni, G. Bruni, A. Buckley, A. Bunyatyan, C. M. Buttar, J. M. Butterworth, S. Butterworth, M. Cacciari, T. Carli, G. Cerminara, S. Chekanov, M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, J. Collins, A. Cooper-Sarkar, G. Corcella, M. Corradi, B. E. Cox, R. Croft, Z. Czyczula, A. Dainese, M. Dasgupta, G. Davatz, L. Del Debbio, Y. Delenda, A. De Roeck, M. Diehl, S. Diglio, G. Dissertori, M. Dittmar, J. Ellis, K. J. Eskola, T. O. Eynck, J. Feltesse, F. Ferro, R. D. Field, J. Forshaw, S. Forte, A. Geiser, S. Gieseke, A. Glazov, T. Gleisberg, P. Golonka, E. Gotsman, G. Grindhammer, M. Grothe, C. Group, M. Groys, A. Guffanti, G. Gustafson, C. Gwenlan, S. Hoche, C. Hogg, J. Huston, G. Iacobucci, G. Ingelman, S. Jadach, H. Jung, J. Kalliopuska, M. Kapishin, B. Kersevan, V. Khoze, M. Klasen, M. Klein, B. A. Kniehl, V. J. Kolhinen, H. Kowalski, G. Kramer, F. Krauss, S. Kretzer, K. Kutak, J. W. Lamsa, L. Lonnblad, T. Lastovicka, G. Lastovicka-Medin, E. Laenen, Th. Lagouri, J. I. Latorre, N. Lavesson, V. Lendermann, E. Levin, A. Levy, A. V. Lipatov, M. Lublinsky, L. Lytkin, T. Maki, L. Magnea, F. Maltoni, M. Mangano, U. Maor, C. Mariotti, N. Marola, A. D. Martin, A. Meyer, S. Moch, J. Monk, A. Moraes, A. Morsch, L. Motyka, E. Naftali, P. Newman, A. Nikitenko, F. Oljemark, R. Orava, M. Ottela, K. Osterberg, K. Peters, F. Petrucci, A. Piccione, A. Pilkington, K. Piotrzkowski, O. I. Piskounova, A. Proskuryakov, A. Prygarin, J. Pumplin, K. Rabbertz, R. Ranieri, V. Ravindran, B. Reisert, E. Richter-Was, L. Rinaldi, P. Robbe, E. Rodrigues, J. Rojo, H. Ruiz, M. Ruspa, M. G. Ryskin, A. Sabio Vera, G. P. Salam, A. Schalicke, S. Schatzel, T. Schorner-Sadenius, I. Schienbein, F-P. Schilling, S. Schumann, M. H. Seymour, F. Siegert, T. Sjostrand, M. Skrzypek, J. Smith, M. Smizanska, H. Spiesberger, F. Schrempp, A. Stasto, H. Stenzel, W. J. Stirling, P. Szczypka, S. Tapprogge, C. Targett-Adams, M. Tasevsky, T. Teubner, R. S. Thorne, A. Tonazzo, A. Tricoli, N. Tuning, J. Turnau, U. Uwer, P. Van Mechelen, R. Venugopalan, M. Verducci, J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, R. Vogt, B. F. L. Ward, Z. Was, G. Watt, B. M. Waugh, C. Weiser, M. R. Whalley, M. Wing, J. Winter, S. A. Yost, G. Zanderighi, N. P. Zotov

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

The HERA electron--proton collider has collected 100 pb$^{-1}$ of data since its start-up in 1992, and recently moved into a high-luminosity operation mode, with upgraded detectors, aiming to increase the total integrated luminosity per experiment to more than 500 pb$^{-1}$. HERA has been a machine of excellence for the study of QCD and the structure of the proton. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which will collide protons with a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV, will be completed at CERN in 2007. Read More

We discuss the physics underlying an all-order resummation of logarithmic enhanced contributions to dijet cross sections, and present preliminary results for the distribution in the dijet transverse energy difference in DIS. Read More

**Affiliations:**

^{1}Cambridge,

^{2}NIKHEF

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We present the joint threshold and recoil resummed transverse momentum distributions for heavy quark hadroproduction, at next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. We exhibit their dependence on the production channel and the color configurations, and compare these distributions to eachother and to NLO. Read More

We consider the energy flow into gaps between hard jets. It was previously believed that the accuracy of resummed predictions for such observables can be improved by employing the $k_t$ clustering procedure to define the gap energy in terms of a sum of energies of soft jets (rather than individual hadrons) in the gap. This significantly reduces the sensitivity to correlated soft large-angle radiation (non-global leading logs), numerically calculable only in the large $N_c$ limit. Read More

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

We review the work discussed and developed under the topic ``Resummation'' at Working Group 2 ``Multijet final states and energy flow'', of the HERA-LHC Workshop. We emphasise the role played by HERA observables in the development of resummation tools via, for instance, the discovery and resummation of non-global logarithms. We describe the event-shapes subsequently developed for hadron colliders and present resummed predictions for the same using the automated resummation program CAESAR. Read More

We present joint threshold and recoil resummed transverse momentum distributions for heavy quark hadroproduction, at next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. We study the dependence of these distributions on the production channel, the color configurations and the differences with the pure threshold-resummed distribution. Read More

We show that a resummation of infrared logarithms is needed to obtain a sensible theoretical description of dijet rates when symmetric cuts are applied to the transverse energies of both jets. We also present the next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) resummation we carried out for DIS production of two jets selected with the cone algorithm. Read More

Next-to-leading logarithmic final-state resummed predictions have traditionally been calculated, manually, separately for each observable. In this article we derive NLL resummed results for generic observables. We highlight and discuss the conditions that the observable should satisfy for the approach to be valid, in particular continuous globalness and recursive infrared and collinear safety. Read More

This article introduces definitions for a number of new event shapes and jet-rates in hadron-hadron dijet production. They are designed so as to be measurable in practice at the Tevatron and the LHC, and to be global so that they can be resummed with currently available techniques. We explain how to vary their sensitivity to beam fragmentation, limiting its impact for purely perturbative studies, or deliberately enhancing it so as to focus on non-perturbative effects. Read More

**Authors:**M. Dobbs, S. Frixione, E. Laenen, A. De Roeck, K. Tollefson, J. Andersen, C. Balazs, A. Banfi, S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, T. Binoth, A. Brandenburg, C. Buttar, Q-H. Cao, G. Corcella, A. Cruz, I. Dawson, V. Del Duca, V. Drollinger, L. Dudko, T. Eynck, R. Field, M. Grazzini, J. P. Guillet, G. Heinrich, J. Huston, N. Kauer, N. Kidonakis, A. Kulesza, K. Lassila-Perini, L. Magnea, F. Mahmoudi, E. Maina, F. Maltoni, M. Nolten, A. Moraes, S. Moretti, S. Mrenna, P. Nadolsky, Z. Nagy, F. Olness, I. Puljak, D. A. Ross, A. Sabio-Vera, G. P. Salam, A. Sherstnev, Z. G. Si, T. Sjostrand, P. Skands, E. Thome, Z. Trocsanyi, P. Uwer, S. Weinzierl, C. P. Yuan, G. Zanderighi

**Category:**High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

This report documents the results obtained by the Working Group on Quantum Chromodynamics and the Standard Model for the Workshop `Physics at TeV Colliders'', Les Houches, France, 26 May - 6 June 2003. After a Monte Guide description, the first contributions report on progress in describing multiple interactions, important for the LHC, and underlying events. An announcement of a Monte Carlo database, under construction, is then followed by a number of contributions improving parton shower descriptions. Read More

We consider dijet production in the region where symmetric cuts on the transverse energy, $E_t$, are applied to the jets. In this region next-to--leading order calculations are unreliable and an all-order resummation of soft gluon effects is needed, which we carry out. Although, for illustrative purposes, we choose dijets produced in deep inelastic scattering, our general ideas apply additionally to dijets produced in photoproduction or $\gamma \gamma$ processes and should be relevant also to the study of prompt di-photon $E_t$ spectra in association with a recoiling jet, in hadron-hadron processes Read More

We build a computer code that fully automates the resummation of jet-observable distributions at next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. As an application we present results for a jet shape in hadronic dijet production. Read More